Similar sound characteractics to MIT cables?

It is quite easy to explain: I only sell a 3 dimensional intimate and papable image. I use all the parts what influences the emotion of people.

Audio is comparing, first I explain how I work and what my sound is. After this you give a demo with the people their own music. After this I send them to many other shops as possible. Because I want audio to be as open as possible.

Then they come back, often you hear the stories about how low the other demos are. Most sets in audioshops are always 2 dimensional. These are facts again. 

In all shootouts I did ( hundreds now) between 2 and 3 dimensional sound each person chooses for 3 dimensional sound. This is only a part of Tru-Fi. But an important part for how music influences our emotion. I never met any person who prefers a 2 dimensional sound.

I n 2007 I started to use all the parts which are important for highend in the mid price range as well. This has become very succesful.

hi Bo,
 with due respect... with your extensive experience and understanding of cable properties (characteristics), can you recommend me cables that would let me hear music as if i'm in a grand hall listening to the majestic sound produced by full scale orchestral or big concert (pop/ R&B modern music)?  
i don't wish to hear exactly how the recording is made because often it is done in a (big?) recording studio instead of a grand stage. i want big open sound with clarity, pinpoint imaging yet with separation and musical energy, not the congested sounds from a recording studio. Thanks

i don't listen to small scale music, solo, quintets, vocals, jazz, chamber music do not interest me, hence, timbre accuracy is not important here. i don't need to hear the difference between clarinet and flute , horn and trombone, oboe and cello but i need to hear every individual note coming from every instruments. thanks 

I have the MIT MH750 ...no boxes...ca 1988 I think,  shotgun configuration. I believe they were the original MITs, released before the "boxes". Haven't used them since 1993...:). Back in the days, I paired them with Martin Logan CLS. Sounded great. 

Per OP...

" MIT cables sound relax, a tad laid back, yet clear and no veil/curtain between performance and listener, dynamic are natural without harshness."

Would OP's description of SQ apply to mine? .

You don't understand what I mean. First of all it is not about recommendation.

I sell a sound, this means that the parts in a set builds the sound what I want to create, The sound is the main thing. 

I am only interested in properties what each part owns. For example I use the properties Audioquest can give. This way it is a different way of using audio.

I prefer Audioquest and Purist Audio over most other brands because I use their blacklevel for my sound. They both are exeptional in individual focus of instruments and voices. The same about differences in height of voices and instruments. 

I compare many brands all the time. But I focus on all the properties you judge sound for. With speakers, amps and sources I do the same.

But at the end I have a more complete sound with a lot more emotion.  It makes audio a lot more effective. Each part o your set owns properties and togheter they create the sound and stage you hear at home.

When you understand the properties you can use audio so much more effective.