Has biwire speaker cabling become "old" ?

Nice Dave.  I don't need to kiss anyones butt.  Been around audio plenty and there are some who's ideas I align with as they make sense.  Well before I even liked his speakers, I was into MIT cables. I loved them and even had my Quicksilver preamp fully wired with Brisson's wire and solder.  Loved what it did to the sound.

Are you upset that folks like his Q&A area on his site?  Seems like good business to me.  He likes to interact with folks and most like that.  I always enjoy meeting designers and listening to why they do what they do.  It's the only way to learn as long as you keep an open mind.  Doesn't mean I have to agree or like their product, but it's good business.  

I guess I don't fully understand your problem with folks liking  Mr Vandersteen.  He's a nice guy who has a passion for audio and he likes to share.  Most in our business seem to be that way.  

Sorry, I was out of line....I apologize.  Sometimes I think common sense and experimentation can yield verifiable results without relying to heavily on any one mans gospel.  RV is a good egg however, just need to balance sage advice with actual trial and error sometimes to determine if what does it for the adviser delivers for the advisee!

more expensive cable price, doesn't necessarily mean better performance.  You must hear the cable in your own system to know if it helps.  If it does...bi-wire if your speakers are designed for it.  Use seperate cables for the top and bottom... The cables that have 2 spades on one end and 4 on the other are far less effective.  Keep the cables seperated

MIT delivers otherworldly musical vistas for me...all else is just wire.  There are patents involved!

Biwiring is BS!   Most of the time, no audible improvement IMO.

Been there, tried it.