2. cables
  3. 123999-41

Cerious Technologies NEW Graphene Cables

Now, this is not a advertisement, just a posting sharing my experience on some well made great sounding cables at a very reasonable price. Besides, I don't think Cerious Technologies is set up for a big influx of cable orders.

But, if you get the chance to try these cables, please do.

I have been interested in the newer cables coming out that are using Graphene as a conductor. SR cables seemed interesting, but I always hated the way there cables had all those extra wires (with the active shields and such). I then noticed an ad early in I think November or December from Cerious Technologies for Graphene cables. I investigated how the cables were assembled and it seemed like quite a laborious process.

I ordered (with a 30 day money back guarantee) the balanced Graphene interconnects, and boy did they impress me. Such depth, soundstage, realism, frequency smoothness, effortless sound. I was truly impressed!  I now have a complete loom of the Cerious Technologies Graphene cables. That is; interconnects, speaker cables, digital cables and power cords.

I ended up selling all of my other cables and to those of you who have read my postings know that cables have always been my curiosity.

So, as I began this post, let me again iterate, I have no alliance to the company, my posting is for those of you looking for an great alternate high quality Graphene made cable without spending a fortune.

128x128ozzy
ozzy's avatar
ozzy OP
7,534 posts
 
jond, Thank you.
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
The manufacturer never mentioned the ceramic slurry in his post on this thread. He said the Graphene was contained inside the cable in close contact with the copper/silver by heat shrink, which makes sense to me, assuming he was using the Graphene as a second conductive network. Besides if the Graphene were suspended in ceramic it couldn’t conduct, assuming that’s the objective, given that ceramic is an insulator not a conductor and that the Graphene would not be continuous. There would be no difference between the Nano cables and the Extreme Graphene cables other than the carbon was a different form. And even then I’m not sure the "Graohene" as used in the cables wouldn’t lose it’s unusual properties when is "all crammed in there" as it were with the copper/silver conductors since Graphene has the unique physical characteristic of being one atom thick. It's hard work to obtain the one atom layer of Graphene, seems counterproductive to make it thick again; if it was crammed in there without the liquid ceramic it wouldn’t be one atom thick any more. Am I missing something?

ivan_nosnibor's avatar
ivan_nosnibor
1,052 posts
 
Geoff, from what I understand there are new types of ceramics being developed these days that are indeed highly conductive...
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
Thanks but wouldn’t ceramics that were highly conductive defeat the whole purpose of Graphene which is super-highly conductive? The ceramic slurry with Graphene suspended in it would only be as conductive as the ceramics, not the Graphene. Makes more sense to use pure Graphene. That is if in fact their objective is high conductivity. And if ceramics were really high conductivity why not use ceramics for the backbone? Or just have a Ceramics cable? As the Cerious cable person stated he filled all the voids in the copper/silver backbone with Graphene and used shrink wrap to hold the Graphene in place. He did not mention ceramics. What value would ceramics bring to the table? The Copper/silver backbones provides strength and rigidity.

ivan_nosnibor's avatar
ivan_nosnibor
1,052 posts
 
I honestly don’t have the answers to any of your Q’s. I have no way of knowing if Bob is even utilizing conductive ceramics in any of his designs. But, as far as your Q’s above go, I was rather hoping you could tell me. ;>)
More to discover