Well, in many ways the audition was great BUT both amps have their plusses and minuses. For example, the JR is deep and rich. It has a control quality that seems to excel in the midrange which, in my opinion, is gorgeous. Remember, I don't know the technical terms for these things but it is what I heard. I would say it is a mature amp. One that you could live with for a long time. Was it analytical? Maybe. And this is where the VAC Sigma comes in. Not as much punch (weight?), clarity or sound distinction, but an overall presence that is engaging. For acoustic vocals the JR wins hands down in my view. For chorus pieces maybe the VAC. For quartets, opera and classical they seem even in some ways. I missed the JR when the VAC was on, and the VAC when the JR was on. Perhaps when I go to hear the IQ both of these differences will be captured. Or, as some of you have suggested, a tube pre-amp down the road with the JR. Does that sum it up?
Jeff Rowlands Amp and Dac vs. VAC amp and DAC
Hello, I am new to this forum but I have a question. I am trying to pair an amp + DAC with my Wilson Sabrinas. I have listened to Jeff Rowlands integrated with the Aeris DAC. And the VAC Sigma integrated with the Aeris DAC. Price is a factor and so is space. Does the 625 need a pre-amp? Any suggestions or thoughts?
- ...
- 478 posts total
Yes your summary is fine and there are no problems with your descriptive writing skills, I understand you clearly . Tube preamp with the Rowland could certainly be a very good option. One thing to keep in mind, you can modify the sound of a tube power amplifier via trying different brands of tubes (both the output and the input /driver tubes). This is what many refer to as "tube rolling". You can tailor the sound of a tube amplifier. One thing I can tell, you know what you're hearing and that's an excellent trait to have. I have all the confidence that you'll choose wisely, you know what you like. Charles, |
I missed the JR when the VAC was on, and the VAC when the JR was on. Perhaps when I go to hear the IQ both of these differences will be captured.Given the Sabrina’s impedance curve that I linked to earlier, as well as the listening experiences with the Sabrina that have been described by some of the others, I suspect that the 1 to 2 ohm output tap of the 200iq stands a significantly better chance of accomplishing that than the 2 to 4 ohm tap, and certainly than the 4 to 8 ohm tap. I presume, btw, that what you listened to today was the Sigma integrated (which does not have a 1 to 2 ohm tap), and that its 4 ohm tap was what was used. Continued best of luck, and best regards, -- Al |
rinpoche, My current amp is the JR 625 S2. I always like to preface my comments with, no absolutes in audio and one man's medicine is another's poison. To my ears the 625 S2 is simply outstanding. The midrange is produced with a realism that is hard to describe, it's truly a chameleon that's capable of reproducing whatever is on the recording...e.g if the soundstage is wide or if there is no bass in a recording that is what you will hear. The only thing that I would want more of is power because of my room's dimensions and the size of my speakers. If I had the money I would move up the JR line. |
- 478 posts total