What makes an expensive speaker expensive


When one plunks down $10,000 $50,000 and more for a speaker you’re paying for awesome sound, perhaps an elegant or outlandish style, some prestige ... but what makes the price what it is?

Are the materials in a $95,000 set of speakers really that expensive? Or are you paying a designer who has determined he can make more by selling a few at a really high price as compared to a lot at a low price?

And at what point do you stop using price as a gauge to the quality? Would you be surprised to see $30,000 speakers "outperform" $150,000 speakers?

Too much time on my hands today I guess.
128x128jimspov
Lot's of ideas and in the end every company is very different.  Many companies are not that expensive to make, but they are large structures and priced accordingly.  Some give you a LOT of high quality components and hand made drivers with tons of R&D.  I know of two companies like this and both sound GREAT to me.  Every company has a different way to price.  The other thing I've mentioned earlier is that every company has a different points for the dealers.  I've heard numbers from 30% to over 50%.  That's HUGE.  When you hear of a dealer or manufacture selling for steep discounts, those are obviously the ones at or near 50% I would assume.  When you get a company where you can't get much if anything off, then they are probably much closer to the 30% profit margin to the dealer.  There is no right or wrong answer to this question, but it's a great thing to discuss and think about.
Having said that, I do think that really good speakers should and have the right to be quite expensive. But $100k ? Give me a break. You can buy a sure path to American citizenship for a little over $500k, and you won't lose anything in the end, it's investment. Now that's cheap. Going to be a million soon, as I heard.
Personally even if I had that kind of money, I'd never spend it.  The best speakers I've ever heard in a system are the Tidal (the big ones at well over 100k) and the Vandersteen 7 Mk 2's at 62k.  The only reason I can say the Vandy's to me are a great value is that they sound better (to me) than anything over their cost AND for only 15k more (or so) you can now get their dedicated high pass matching subs to make even bigger sound in your room if that's what you feel you need.  That's still only 77k total.  To me, that's paying off a huge chunk of my mortgage so that's never happening, lol.  For folks who can afford it, I'm very happy for them and don't blame them one bit for spending what they want.  They earned, or stole it so....;)
But...if you have a very big room and listen to orchestra and want great sound - cost of the speakers and amps will be much higher. Other than that, $100k for the entire system is more than enough, in my opinion. In used prices this would be, say, $55k. Still a lot of money but within the reach of many.
One thing that keeps coming up is that we are paying for R&D.  Wrong. If a speaker maker sold speakers for the sum cost of their expenses it would be almost like loosing money. 

No product, good or service should be sold at cost.  You always pay for more than what it costs, you pay for the perceived and relative value.  That perceived value is complicated, but that's what product managers get paid to calculate. 

Mind you, I buy and sell services and goods, so I'm not saying this practice is wrong.  I just want to make sure readers and posters understand this.