2. music
  3. 125167-76283

Beach Boys Pet Sounds by Analogue Productions

OK, so I was banned from the S. Hoffman site for saying I had a sibilance on my mono copy of AP Pet Sounds.  I described that it had very lush mids and strong bass but was confused by the sibilance.  So, I made a post asking people if there may be a problem with playback of mono through my stereo setup and...mentioned Pet Sounds! (had no idea there was a psycho lurking).  I also asked if anyone else had been experiencing this because I wasn't getting it on other LPs.   Long story short, after a couple of informative responses from normal people, Hoffman makes a very angry post that completely trashes me and hurls some generic insults.  I gave it back to him because it was just so infantile of a response that I couldn't resist.  I just instantly lost respect I guess.  After a few back and forths, I sent a personal message asking that my account be deleted.  Instead he banned me, and of course the thread was deleted, just like every other thread about Pet Sounds with any real content.  Even though I'm banned, it looks like I'm still listed as an active member, I assume so that it's not obvious to other members that he got mad and banned someone for not praising his work.  Unbelievable.  

Long story short, the responses I got before the host got involved were positive, stating that others were not experiencing the sibilance that I was.  What was weirder was that I had already stated that I was thinking that it was either my system or unique to the LP I received.  Anyway, I was hoping it was safe to talk about this LP here...or does he control this site too?   Hope not!
jokerman1226
whart's avatar
whart
3,062 posts
 
I'm a pretty regular participant there, but didn't see your thread. I'm not a huge Pet Sounds fanatic (I know some people regard it as a pinnacle album) and have that old Carl and the Passions twofer.
As for Steve and being banned, I know that if you argue with a mod, let alone Steve over a warning, you will get banned. Whether that applied in your case, I have no idea. 
jokerman1226 OP
18 posts
 
Yes, I knew I was going to get banned but that's me.  I'm sickened seeing people kiss butt to moderators/dealers, etc. over their real opinions and that happens on pretty much all forums. I'm in same boat in that I'm not familar with the recording as much as others.  The problem was that I had a perhaps naive, but very real question about an audio recording but forgot that Stevie Hoffman was the engineer and that he was very sensitive.

 I'm listening to it now and it's all over the place and it's not audiophile in most places.  I DO understand though that it is prob the best version available.  I have a friend who explained that the original recording kind of sucks.  That is,the kind of info I needed!
jafant's avatar
jafant
19,906 posts
 
Do not feel bad- jokerman1226

the SH forums is operated by communists. Once, one figures this fact out, it is not difficult to understand the rest. Yes, one gets banned for any disagreement. This, very clearly, is a violation against our 1st Amendment Rights!
Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
6,011 posts
 
jafant
Yes, one gets banned for any disagreement. This, very clearly, is a violation against our 1st Amendment Rights!

What you describe is very clearly not even remotely a First Amendment violation. Sorry, but you need to read the Bill of Rights more carefully.

The First Amendment offers protection from government censorship. It offers no protection from censorship by private entities. That's perfectly legal, and widely practiced.
czarivey
5,946 posts
 
Yep,
Mass media considered to be 'private' companies that provide government censorship to their programs to viewers so that's perfectly legal as well.
More to discover