Hi, yes I have them! I have been so incredibly busy that I have not had time to properly research calculated placement, etc. It is next on my agenda. Anyway... Right out the crate, the difference from the 2ce's is striking. I previously had the vandy sub which is completely unnecessary with these Wilsons. The sound is fantastic. Much more "aggressive" and powerful compared to the 2ce's. I'm not good with the eloquent technical jargon, but let's just say it was a phenomenal and obvious difference and a completely meaningful upgrade! I couldn't be happier.
Wilson Sophia 1 vs vandersteen 2ce
Hi, this may be a no-brainer but I'm looking for some reassurance. I'm looking for a substantial speaker upgrade over my 2ce's. I'm looking at used Sophia 1s. I also have the vandy sub. The rest of by system is :
vtl preamp
belles 150 v2
vpi Classic 1 with dynavector karat.
thanks!!!!
vtl preamp
belles 150 v2
vpi Classic 1 with dynavector karat.
thanks!!!!
- ...
- 50 posts total
I've owned 3 versions of the 2s and have heard Wilson Sophias on multiple occasions, although they were always 2 or 3s, not the 1s..... With the Belles, I would stay with Vandersteen........ The only significant upgrade you could make over the Vandys would be to go to Magnepan.......they absolutely are magic with Belles..... Audio Connection in NJ carries both brands....... I really don't think Wilson will make you happy long term unless you went up to Sabrina, which would be 7x as much as 2CESIGs |
Here’s why I cannot accept Wilson’s design philosophy (and yes, I have listened to number of Wilson models over the years and, except for an early Watt/Puppy combo, they have never grabbed my attention): Vandersteen are time and phase coherent; their drivers are in the same acoustic polarity with first order crossovers that do minimum damage to phase/time based components of timbre. Wilson Sophia, on the other hand (according to Stereophile): "In the time domain, the Sophia’s step response (fig.7) reveals that its tweeter and woofer are connected in positive acoustic polarity, the midrange in inverted polarity—which is what is needed, in conjunction with the phase shift provided by the crossover, to ensure that the outputs of the drive-units add to give a flat response in the farfield in the crossover regions." Read more at http://www.stereophile.com/content/wilson-audio-specialties-sophia-loudspeaker-measurements#rl7vxTdM... Wilson is not, and never will be, a viable speaker option for me; their approach and designs (and prices!) make absolutely no sense to me. |
- 50 posts total