I've owned much gear and cables of all variety in many systems and in various environments. After 30 years, one thing has survived the test of time...my choice of cabling. Now, more than ever, MIT delivers true audiophile performance. Large spacious sound stage, oodles of low level detail, micro and macro dynamics to die for, tone beyond reproach, extreme extension/control and flexible designs which adapt to various systems! Simply the best
Cable Controversy
I love the cable forum. Discussions about cable can really generate sparks among the mature audiophiles. Regarding cable design: Other than the basics of resistance, impedance, and conductance, it seems that there is very little firm ground upon which one can form convincing conclusions. Witness the bewildering array of cable designs, incoporating network boxes, magnets, biased shields, liquid conductors, solid core, braided strands, exotic metals, air dialectrics, to name but a few. In contrast: Regarding balanced cables, at least one experienced poster and equipment designer has stated here that all balanced cables perform identically, once a few basic design parameters are met. I ask for the voices of experience and sanity to offer their theories and experience on the topic of cable design and performance. Thanks in advance.
- ...
- 79 posts total
- 79 posts total