Cable Controversy


I love the cable forum. Discussions about cable can really generate sparks among the mature audiophiles. Regarding cable design: Other than the basics of resistance, impedance, and conductance, it seems that there is very little firm ground upon which one can form convincing conclusions. Witness the bewildering array of cable designs, incoporating network boxes, magnets, biased shields, liquid conductors, solid core, braided strands, exotic metals, air dialectrics, to name but a few. In contrast: Regarding balanced cables, at least one experienced poster and equipment designer has stated here that all balanced cables perform identically, once a few basic design parameters are met.  I ask for the voices of experience and sanity to offer their theories and experience on the topic of cable design and performance. Thanks in advance.
psag
Hifiman5, yes...various MIT CABLES over the years and many many many alternative cable designs used as well.  After awhile you start to learn what consistently seems to grab you and compel you to listen over and over again!  Only MIT and Transparent cables have ever done that for me.
Then you are all set!  There is a certain sense of satisfaction and certainty once you find what works for you and how you perceive sound.  I supposed I am there with speakers more so than cables as I have owned and own Vandersteen speakers for 30+ years now.  The Treo CTs that I recently purchased are by far the greatest realization for me of Richard Vandersteen's design prowess.  What sounds like music to him sounds so to me as well.  Couldn't be happier.
Cables make aa difference sure but there is so much to do with components first that imp are the key to getting you there first.  Each system and your ears have to do with what you will prefer kinda like as vs tube sound but just go with what you prefer. Happy listening