You guys are missing the point, and what Rok hits on (and the Harlem photo) goes back to the issue of popularity. Jazz will never be as popular as it once was, and there will never be as many movers and shakers living at any one point in time; that is not being disputed. The problem is when blanket statements like these are made:
"There were more jazz musicians in the 60's"
"It was a jazz community then but not now"
"It's about the money now"
"Players today don't care as much about producing great art"
C'mon now, those things are simply not true, and when you guys are spending a good deal of time and on a regular basis around these players and experiencing these things first hand, then you can make those proclamations with authority; until then..... Look, sharing of ideas is a great thing, but it is important to have a more comprehensive scope. The reason that I feel strongly about this is two-fold: you guys love jazz and I believe you are way too quick to dismiss much contemporary jazz. Not necessarily to like it, but to acknowledge its integrity; there's a lot of new jazz out there worth listening to. But, more importantly, is the irony of this outlook. That outlook does not help, but hinders, the promotion of jazz itself and I hope we can all agree, at least, that the future of jazz is worth promoting.