Let me see if I understand your twisted logic: By spending money on new LPs, turntables, tonearms, cartridges, and phono stages, vinylphiles are "ruining the business". Yes, it's probably a dying business, but those of us who enjoy vinyl are certainly not to blame for that. Meantime, my advice is cut back on the coffee.
Where is the significant point of diminishing returns on hi-end turntable?
For those that don’t know me I am newish to this game. Yes, I believe this chase for perfection in sound reproduction is a game. There are endless variables affecting the sound of every system and 100x that in opinions on each of these variables. I love cool $hit as much as the next guy but I am looking for an analog rig and I keep getting drawn into the seemingly endless "what about this option that costs tons more?". I started with a $6 to $10K budget and now I am considering a $25K setup (Table, cart and phono stage) after talking to a local retailer. I will be blunt, I want to be that guy in the Memorex ad from the 80’s that is getting blown away by his system (my impression is he is overwhelmed by the amazing sound coming from that speaker not the volume). Now that I have acquired some pretty descent stuff I am spending 15 plus hours each week listening and really enjoying this hobby. I don’t want to have any regrets and just be marginally satisfied with my setup but where do I draw the line? Back to my initial question; what is a reasonable amount to spend on an analog setup to achieve the best bang for the buck? I may be somewhat unique in that I don’t want to constantly be upgrading my equipment, I just want to buy great products the first time that are very satisfying and spend hours listening to great music. I don’t want to be the guy always chasing the next great thing.
- ...
- 209 posts total
Hometheater, The best thing you wrote in your uncalled for diatribe was, "End of rant". Promise? Because I don't think you're through bitching. You're over, but not through. Let me see if I understand your twisted logic: By spending money on new LPs, turntables, tonearms, cartridges, and phono stages, vinylphiles are "ruining the business". Yes, it's probably a dying business, but those of us who enjoy vinyl are certainly not to blame for that. Meantime, my advice is cut back on the coffee. |
Rushton, you stated that 25K would not be your point of diminishing returns, and neither would it be for the OP. Now I'm just sitting here with my buttered popcorn waiting for some examples of the kind of rig someone would chose, when 25K did not approach that point the OP spoke of. Maybe if 25K did not approach that point of diminishing returns, then possibly one of these turntables would be suitable; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfIUh0S7yTQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2QfjcgDjsY Although I'm in the little league, I've always wanted to see how those in the big league play the game. Enjoy the music. |
Hometheaterreview and shydog, Out of necessity, it is considered common courtesy not to get on a vinyl thread and tell everyone that vinyl sucks and digital rules and the same applies to vinyl people posting on digital threads. This is necessary because telling people that their format of choice sucks doesn’t change anyone’s mind and leads to a lot of arguing and hostility, you know, flame wars. Most people are really tired of flame wars, name calling and hostility, so please be courteous and if you want to write about the superiority of digital, start a "Digital Rules" thread in the Digital Forum. It really does work better that way. |
- 209 posts total