Interconnects, some have directional indicators, why?


I'm curious as to why some interconnects are directional? Is there a physical internal difference and do they generally sound better and cost more than non-directional cables? Thanks for your interest.
phd
mihorn wrote,

"One has to listen 10~20 seconds (depends on the length of cable) for signal to find the way."

whoa! what! hey! did you forget to put a smiley face?
So, this begs the question: will the sound improve if the amplifier is placed lower than the source components so the electrons could travel more freely down hill following the direction in the cable? This might explain why most serious audiophiles put their amplifiers on the lowest shelf on the rack. Just wondering...
Kalali, you can do that, but good electrons, that you paid for, might leave the cable, being replaced by just plain cheap electrons.
So, this begs the question: will the sound improve if the amplifier is placed lower than the source components so the electrons could travel more freely down hill following the direction in the cable? This might explain why most serious audiophiles put their amplifiers on the lowest shelf on the rack. Just wondering...

If you wait for the electrons to carry the signal to the amp from the source there is a good chance you would have time to shower, shave, and have a cup of coffee before you would hear a single note through your speakers.

The audio signal travels down the wire in the form of an electromagnetic wave from the source to the load.

The word electricity refers generally to the movement of electrons (or other charge carriers) through a conductor in the presence of potential and an electric field. The speed of this flow has multiple meanings. In everyday electrical and electronic devices, the signals or energy travel as electromagnetic waves typically on the order of 50%–99% of the speed of light, while the electrons themselves move (drift) much more slowly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_electricity

More for you to read.
 http://science.uniserve.edu.au/school/curric/stage6/phys/stw2002/sefton.pdf
It wouldn’t surprise me if under many circumstances a symmetrically designed cable (i.e., a cable having no shield or having a shield that is connected at both ends) were to exhibit directional properties that have nothing to do with the inherent directionality of wire that has been alleged.

A common example of a symmetrically designed cable is a 75 ohm coaxial S/PDIF cable. I would expect such a cable to have small but very possibly measurable differences in VSWR (Voltage Standing Wave Ratio) depending on which way it is connected, due to a combination of soldering differences, mechanical tolerances, small impedance discontinuities in the wire itself, etc. The direction in which it is connected could therefore affect signal reflections and ultimately jitter at the point of D/A conversion.

Similarly, the direction in which a supposedly symmetrically designed analog audio cable is connected could affect energy at RF frequencies that is coupled into or out of the components it is connecting. With the possibility of effects at audible frequencies arising in various ways, such as via intermodulation effects or parasitic diode effects occurring within the components. An extreme example of RF affecting audible frequencies being the many reports that have been seen here and elsewhere over the years of people hearing radio stations when listening to phono sources.

If one has found a symmetrically designed cable to exhibit directional properties, and has verified that the observed directionality is consistent and repeatable across multiple trials, and is not due to extraneous variables such as differences in the warmup state of the equipment, before attributing the difference to inherent directional properties of the wire it seems to me that one must first establish that the cable is in fact symmetrical. And I would feel safe in asserting that no cable is symmetrical to an infinite degree.

So would it be the deviations from perfect symmetry of the cable that are responsible for the perceived difference, or would it be the inherent directional properties of wire that have been alleged by some? As I said here in a recent fuse-related thread:
... it seems to me that audio is somewhat unique in that there are countless technical variables that can be cited for which it is not readily possible to define a quantitative threshold separating what may potentially be audible in some systems from what is unquestionably insignificant. In the absence of that kind of quantitative perspective there is essentially no limit to what a perceived or claimed sonic effect can be attributed to. Or misattributed to.
Regards,
-- Al

More to discover