@ct0517 regarding the shim. This is required simply because of the way my arm had to be installed. No fault in the cartridge whatsoever. It's simply that because my turntable was not designed for 10.5" arms there had to be some compromises in the original arm installation.
The Palladian-A step beyond
The new cartridge from Acoustical Systems may finally be the LOMC to fully realise the theoretical advantages of the genus.
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
- ...
- 391 posts total
Dear Chris, ''I rank revenge-sex, one level above make-up -sex''. The involved categories are very different but ''levels'' by comparisons are the same. I rank Ikeda 9 cantileverless versions above Decca kinds. Assumining that you own an phono-pre with sufficient amplification or use SUT's my advice would be to try Ikeda. As (former) compatriots we should have the same taste (grin). |
Halcro, If Brakemeier gets back to me with any new info, I'll post it. You throw Raul under the bus in defense of...? You're the one who should be ashamed. ct0517, The shibata was the first extended contact tip. It preceded the line contact. The diamond is cut with a different facet on the front and back surfaces. This gives a curved contact area as the record spins, and is characterized by an extended and slightly softened high end. There are two sizes of shibata. The review made reference to the original shibata, but was unclear whether this was in reference to size or shape. Tip dimensions were not given. |
Nandric - I rank Ikeda 9 cantileverless versions above Decca kinds. Nikola Do you think that maybe..... .just maybe....this bias could be based on the tonearms you own; compared to the reference tonearms for each of these designers ? What do you think ? I submit example one. The Ikeda tonearm. http://dagogo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Ikeda-407-1.jpg I submit example two. The Decca Reference tonearm. http://www.needledoctor.com/London-Decca-Reference-Tonearm Do you still think I would prefer the Ikeda design ? 8^0 @Folkfreak, Fleib - thx for that info. |
Dear Chris, The only linear arm I owned was the (old) Rabco. At present I use FR-64 S (silver), FR-64S (copper), Ikeda 345 (copper) , Reed 3 P, Triplanar VII and Sumiko 800 with all 6 countrer weights. My phono-pres are Basis Exclusive (gold) and Klyne PX 3.5 with Denon AU-S1 SUT. All those tonearms can be used with Ikeda 9 CR. Alas I can't afford Decca Ref. nor the Palladian (grin). I see that you become my (former) rich compatriote but I don't see why your Decca should sound better in whatever tonearm. |
- 391 posts total