The Palladian-A step beyond


The new cartridge from Acoustical Systems may finally be the LOMC to fully realise the theoretical advantages of the genus.
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1 
IMAGE 2 
IMAGE 3 
IMAGE 4 
IMAGE 5 
IMAGE 6 
IMAGE 7 
128x128halcro

Halcro, If Brakemeier gets back to me with any new info, I'll post it.

You throw Raul under the bus in defense of...?   You're the one who should be ashamed.

ct0517,

The shibata was the first extended contact tip. It preceded the line contact. The diamond is cut with a different facet on the front and back surfaces. This gives a curved contact area as the record spins, and is characterized by an extended and slightly softened high end.

There are two sizes of shibata. The review made reference to the original shibata, but was unclear whether this was in reference to size or shape. Tip dimensions were not given.

Nandric - I rank Ikeda 9 cantileverless versions above Decca kinds.

Nikola
Do you think that maybe..... .just maybe....this bias could be based on the tonearms you own; compared to the reference tonearms for each of these designers ?

What do you think ?

I submit example one.

The Ikeda tonearm.

http://dagogo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Ikeda-407-1.jpg

I submit example two.

The Decca Reference tonearm.

http://www.needledoctor.com/London-Decca-Reference-Tonearm

Do you still think I would prefer the Ikeda design ?

8^0


@Folkfreak, Fleib - thx for that info.

Dear Chris, The only linear arm I owned was the (old) Rabco.

At present I use FR-64 S (silver), FR-64S (copper), Ikeda 345

(copper) , Reed 3 P, Triplanar VII and Sumiko 800 with all 6

countrer weights. My phono-pres are Basis Exclusive (gold)

and Klyne PX 3.5 with Denon AU-S1 SUT. All those tonearms

can be used with Ikeda 9 CR. Alas I can't afford Decca Ref.

nor the Palladian (grin). I see that you become my (former) rich

compatriote but I don't see why your Decca should sound better

in whatever tonearm.


Dear @ct0517 : What is so " special " in that Decca tonearm?

Please read this:


""" 

With little difficulty, I fitted a Koetsu Urushi, and it was blindingly obvious that this arm was optimised for the behaviour of a London-née-Decca. The London/Koetsu combination lacked the openness, air and power provided by the SME Series V, and this swap also revealed its one downside. Beyond, that is, its unappealing construction and styling, which hardly suggest £2.5k.

SCARY DEMEANOUR
Tersely put, the performance lacks the absolutely robust, carved-from-solid image specificity and sheer mass of the SME Series V. Bass is well-controlled and beautifully taut, but it’s missing that mammoth-stomping-on-a-caveman weight that is beloved of orchestral music lovers and Kodo-drumming aficionados. """"


Could be better than the Ikeda but the Ikeda is not something to die for, neither.


Regards and enjoy the music,

R.

Dear @ : You link trying to tease me makes me laugh and I mean it, I like that you tube link that unfortunatelly helps nothing in the main subjects here. If that is your " common sense " contribution to the thread then that can explain each single word in your posts including your " review ".

Why don’t do a favor to all of us putting some ligth in the next statement you posted:


""" AS product yet they try to destroy their credibility through attacking their design attributes, """"

Any one here and elsewhere wants that you tell us in each one product which one are all its design atributes and compared with....... Could you? other product owners?

Thank’s in advance.

Btw, I told you that if I was wrong that you post and tell me where and why I'm wrong and I'm still waiting for you other than more you tube or histories that is mainly what you showed in this thread.


Regards and enjoy the music,
R.