Recently I upgraded my NAD C326BEE. I'm not sure why I wanted to, perhaps too much reading on sites like this, but I became curious about the C356BEE and found one here with the DAC installed for a pretty good deal.
And of course I had to compare it to the 326 before selling it. Long story short, I can understand those who prefer it over the C356BEE because the C326 really has nice sonics. The soundstage is really well presented with a "live" feel for lack of a better term.
By comparison, the C356 seems more neutral, which seems a little boring until you turn it up. At higher volumes, the C326 seems a little congested when compared with the C356, whose neutrality shines with imaging that seems more accurate at this point. But at lower volumes I can understand the preference some have for the smaller amp.
The other thing that stood out for me was the bass control the C356 has. You don't realize it until comparing with a superior amp, but the C326 bass can be somewhat inaccurate. The C356 has that extra detail and control not present with the smaller amp, and turning it up does not diminish this until you reach the upper limits.
I think the 356 has a better volume pot as well, and that extra set of speaker jacks is handy for A/B'ing sets of speakers. I tried the Pioneer SP-BS22, Ascend Sierra 2 as well as two pairs of Tannoys. The C356 had no trouble with any of it, and in the end I had no regrets with the upgrade.
Now I'm getting curious about the new class D integrated amps from NAD, like the C368. I better stop reading up on it, my audio budget is getting tapped out!
And of course I had to compare it to the 326 before selling it. Long story short, I can understand those who prefer it over the C356BEE because the C326 really has nice sonics. The soundstage is really well presented with a "live" feel for lack of a better term.
By comparison, the C356 seems more neutral, which seems a little boring until you turn it up. At higher volumes, the C326 seems a little congested when compared with the C356, whose neutrality shines with imaging that seems more accurate at this point. But at lower volumes I can understand the preference some have for the smaller amp.
The other thing that stood out for me was the bass control the C356 has. You don't realize it until comparing with a superior amp, but the C326 bass can be somewhat inaccurate. The C356 has that extra detail and control not present with the smaller amp, and turning it up does not diminish this until you reach the upper limits.
I think the 356 has a better volume pot as well, and that extra set of speaker jacks is handy for A/B'ing sets of speakers. I tried the Pioneer SP-BS22, Ascend Sierra 2 as well as two pairs of Tannoys. The C356 had no trouble with any of it, and in the end I had no regrets with the upgrade.
Now I'm getting curious about the new class D integrated amps from NAD, like the C368. I better stop reading up on it, my audio budget is getting tapped out!