"The motors are located farther from the cartridge". But in a DD turntable, the platter IS the rotor. There is no separated motor assembly to "make noise"; the platter is motivated to rotate only by virtue of its being a part of the rotor, being influenced by the magnetic field of the stator. Nothing touches the platter, in other words. The only mechanical noise can come from the bearing assembly, as with any other type of turntable.
Whereas, in a BD turntable, the motor pulley bearing is under constant tension biasing it to one side as it pulls against the platter, which is likewise biased in the direction of the pulley, which cannot help but generate noise. That mechanical noise can be transmitted directly into the platter via the belt; the less compliant the belt, the more efficient it will be at transmitting noise from the motor and pulley. If you ameliorate that issue by using a compliant belt, then you have more belt creep, leading to speed inconstancy. The best virtue of a belt-drive: cheap to build.
You can like whatever you like, but keep the facts straight. IMO, the rim drive is the worst of both worlds, not the best of both. Mechanical vibrational energy from the motor is transmitted right into the platter with no belt to isolate one from the other. At the same time, the typical rubbery contact point between the drive wheel and the platter is constantly trying to rotate the motor in the opposite direction (per Newton's 3rd Law of Motion), and flaws in the O-ring result in mechanical noise and speed issues.
The big issue with DD turntables is simply electronic noise (EMI, especially) that could in theory be picked up by the phono cartridge due to the proximity between the two. Most of the time, the platter itself is an efficient shield. The other problem is motor cogging. But BD and rim drive motors are not at all free of that problem, either, and the best DD turntables have motors of far higher quality than what you will find in most BDs. Why I like coreless motor DD.
Whereas, in a BD turntable, the motor pulley bearing is under constant tension biasing it to one side as it pulls against the platter, which is likewise biased in the direction of the pulley, which cannot help but generate noise. That mechanical noise can be transmitted directly into the platter via the belt; the less compliant the belt, the more efficient it will be at transmitting noise from the motor and pulley. If you ameliorate that issue by using a compliant belt, then you have more belt creep, leading to speed inconstancy. The best virtue of a belt-drive: cheap to build.
You can like whatever you like, but keep the facts straight. IMO, the rim drive is the worst of both worlds, not the best of both. Mechanical vibrational energy from the motor is transmitted right into the platter with no belt to isolate one from the other. At the same time, the typical rubbery contact point between the drive wheel and the platter is constantly trying to rotate the motor in the opposite direction (per Newton's 3rd Law of Motion), and flaws in the O-ring result in mechanical noise and speed issues.
The big issue with DD turntables is simply electronic noise (EMI, especially) that could in theory be picked up by the phono cartridge due to the proximity between the two. Most of the time, the platter itself is an efficient shield. The other problem is motor cogging. But BD and rim drive motors are not at all free of that problem, either, and the best DD turntables have motors of far higher quality than what you will find in most BDs. Why I like coreless motor DD.