Tekton Double Impacts

Thanks for the explanations Al and lowrider. While I don't have a lot of technical knowledge regarding audio equipment, I enjoy learning about it. All this time I was focusing on sensitivity specs without giving thought to impedence. That explains why my tube amp is having a harder time driving the 4 ohm DI's than the 6 ohm Enzo's even though they're both about 98 db sensitive. I'm told the impedence curve also influences how hard a speaker is to drive? The flatter the impedence curve the easier it is to drive? Thanks for your help. While I care more about sound than specs understanding how the electronics and the speakers react to one another is very helpful in choosing the products that will work well together. Thanks again. 

Mofojo,

Steve Deckert of Decware helped me with placing the quadratic diffusers at the first reflection points on the ceiling, one side wall and on the back wall along with building floor to ceiling bass traps in each corner and hanging heavy velvet curtains on the side wall without the diffusers. We also decided to cover all of the exposed ductwork with acoustic foam. The room sounds great. Building a dedicated room was one of the best audio investments I've made. I wish I could share some specific wisdom for your room, but I pretty much followed Steve's advise. My room is in the basement with low ceilings, 7'6", so I guess the bass traps are more necessary. Placing diffusion at the first reflection points seemed to really help along with carpet and padding on the concrete floor. After that experimenting with absorption throughout the room, especially where the walls meet the ceiling would be the extent of my advise. Hope that helps. 

My most excellent audiophile brethren,

I couldn't pass up on an opportunity to chime in on such an interesting thread, such as this one, concerning the Tekton Double Impacts, especially since I have heard them perform 3 weeks ago in TJ's system and 2 weeks ago in Allen Richard's system.  First let me say that anyone just starting up a system, and have not decided on speakers yet, the Double Impacts should definitely be on your short list.  I can't think of anything better at or around its price point.  If you are looking to upgrade speakers at around that price point, and maybe up to $5K-8K, they still should be on short list of speakers to consider.  You get an awful lot of sound and performance from the Double Impacts that's very hard to beat by anyone else's speaker.

The Double Impacts sounded really good in TJs system, though as I told him then, as much as I like how they sound I would have to get more familiar with them before I decided whether I wanted a pair or not. When I heard the Double Impacts in Allen's home, he really drove the heck out of the Double Impacts using a $3400 PrimaLuna 26 watt tube integrated and easily reached life-like levels of volume and dynamics with all kinds of music.  I don't recall if TJ used a sub-woofer or not but Allen did use one.  After hearing them in Allen's system, I was more convinced of the great achievement Eric made with this speaker.  Mike Kay (Audio Archon) puts on a good demo and will show the Double Impact's sonic capabilities with the Linear Tube gear as well as with the likes of Pass Labs.

It would be interesting to see how our planar speaker brethren, especially those who love electrostats feel about the Double Impacts.  I want to reiterate, before I'm called a heretic in this thread, that the Double Impact is a wonderful sounding and performing speaker, especially at its price-point and beyond.  Personally, I like my Wilson Sashas much better, especially for doing audio reviews with, but in my opinion, the Double Impacts are one of the best values in what's available today for speakers.

Tekton Design was far from the first loudspeaker company to publish SPL measurements as we’ve disclosed for years now and if this is the biggest shortcoming found within the Double Impact I’m thrilled! It even looks like someone has already figured out the 2.0V 4 Ohm SPL on this thread. At least I have the courage to advertise it as a 4 Ohm speaker since a few of our competitors (famous mainstream manufacturers) disguise their 4 Ohm loudspeakers as 8 Ohm models - they’ve done this for decades.

Regarding the patent claims... it’s real folks. No P.T. Barnum going on here and the patent examiner agreed with us and gave us a patent allowance.

Respectfully, anyone having trouble grasping the concept of speaker cone moving mass and it’s integral relationship to musical sources: will you please call me prior to making me out to be a bumbling idiot on here. I’ll gladly walk you through it.

I can also see how my claim of others speakers becoming subtly obsolete might be considered inflammatory or even offensive to some. I tend to be candid and frank in my thoughts/opinions. I make the claim and I stand behind it. We have something truly special going on here - you’ll discern it or you won’t. I’m not trying to take over the loudspeaker world nor sell hype... I’m simply want to offer high-quality high-value loudspeaker products.

Sincerely,

Eric Alexander
President
Tekton Design LLC

Thanks for the nice write-up mykeryte. Great to hear from folks with first-hand experience. The statement about whether a sub was or was not used in one of the demos got me to thinking. Since the Double Impacts are spec'd down to 20Hz, wouldn't that make a subwoofer unnecessary? Maybe I'm missing something, or don't fully understand the concept; but I was always under the impression that anything that could produce clean response down to 25Hz - or below - was considered "full range." Translation (to me at least) -> no sub needed. Is that not the case? Anybody?