Cool looking Dac but seriously Denafrips? That might be one of the worst names for audio gear ever :-)
More discrete R2R Mulibit dacs.
There are many now going to the trouble of doing discrete R2R Mulitbit now that the last/latest Burr Brown PCM1704 multibit chip is no longer available "rip".
https://www.vinshineaudio.com/product-page/denafrips-terminator-r2r-dac
Cheers George
https://www.vinshineaudio.com/product-page/denafrips-terminator-r2r-dac
Cheers George
- ...
- 23 posts total
I use an R2R in my dac but that is where the similarities end. It is like saying a preamp uses 6DJ8/6922 tubes but one company uses the Amperex tube brand. It comes down to the component design. My power supply weighs in at 30lbs and I use DHT design. So while the R2R may be better sounding, it still comes down to the design and implementation. If it was just the R2R, I could make a DAC for $500! There are plenty of good sounding DAC chips available such as the Sigma 32 bit for one. Happy Listening. |
bigkidz If you care to look/study and compare most dac chip manufacturer data sheets are adhered to for implementation, even some (hiend ones) using even the exact I/V stage and buffer stage that’s on those data sheets. "Some" (me, Audio Note above ) use different I/V and buffers, but as far as dac implementation itself they nearly all follow the data sheet protocols. But doing discrete with this topic that's another thing again. Cheers George |
- 23 posts total