Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Hi Walter,
Do you have any further listening impressions regarding the Double Impacts and the Line Magnetic 508ia? This combo is very intriguing. 
Charles 
They're dynamic as heck, and reasonably uncolored given that they're pro audio drivers with paper cones.  They move serious amounts of air, and don't need tons of power to do it.

That said, if I liked the Maggie sound I (and I do!) I don't think I could live with Tektons.  I'd use an active crossover and high pass 1.7s.  Or passively cross them over using line-level filters. Dipoles do so many things right ... I'd suggest at least trying better sub-woeferage before giving up them.  Also, Magnaplaner now has dipole subwoofers - they might be worth an audition.

Hi Charles, et al.

Well, nothing is ever easy in audio, is it? I have been spending quite a bit of time comparing the Daedalus and Tekton speakers, and my feelings have sort of evolved, I guess. When I first put back in the Daedalus speakers after two solid weeks of listening through the Double Impacts, my immediate impression was that the Ulysses sounded slightly "purer" and slightly more coherent. The bass wasn't as deep, but felt a little tighter and more focused. On the other hand, the DI  speakers were, overall, more immersive and certainly easier to drive, though the Ulysses are also very efficient. If I had been forced to make a decision in the moment, I met have kept the Ulysses.

A couple of days later, I put back in the Double Impacts and found that I had really been missing their incredible sound stage and dynamics. Over the next several days, I perceived improvements in coherence and the bass, which seemed to gain depth and focus as they surpassed a hundred hours or so. 

I put the Ulysses back in again, and this time the differences I perceived earlier were not as pronounced. Maybe the Ulysses were still just a touch more coherent with a tad more clarity in sorting out difficult passages, but we are talking a matter of degrees here. This time, I found that I was missing the DI's presentation and that the Ulysses might sound just a little boxy, by comparison.

One of my biggest fears is  that despite all of DI's obvious strengths, they might not be quite as musical as the Ulysses over the long haul. That is one reason I have taken my sweet time doing this evaluation---I need to make sure I get this right before selling off the greatest pair of speakers I have ever owned. Indeed, the Ulysses are magical speakers, as beautiful to look at as to listen through.

The DI cannot match the Ulysses in the looks department, that is for sure, nor should they be expected to at their respective price points. But are they as musical? My conclusion is that they certainly are, and I don't think they are done breaking in completely yet. I still think there are certain areas where the Ulysses might hold a slight advantage, but there are also areas where the DI speakers have an advantage. 

In summary, this has been quite a battle between two great speakers. As always, it is going to come down to the listener's sonic priorities and preferences, as well as whether appearance is a huge factor, which is not to say the DI speakers are unattractive--we are talking relative to the furniture quality Daedalus speakers here.

I am going to do one more intensive comparison in a few days, but these are my thoughts so far. It has been challenging trying to sort all of this out, but a lot of fun as well. Barring some eleventh hour epiphany, the Double Impacts are here to stay. They are just as terrific as everybody else here says they are, at least in my view and for my tastes.
Thanks for such a thorough and enlightening review Walter. Like you I find something magical about the DI's that keeps drawing me in. My comparison with the Legacy Focus SE was easy for me as dynamics play an important part in my listening enjoyment and I've not heard a speaker yet that beats the DI in that department......yet I'm sure they are out there.  What makes the DI so special to me is that it's so much more than a dynamic speaker. The immersive wall of sound they create draws me into the music. Your Daedelus/DI battle sounds neck and neck but given more time I believe the DI's will win out.....they are addictive! With the automotive paint I find the DI's to be attractive but obviously not the furniture grade look that Daedelus does so well. I have a WyWires PowerBroker that Daedelus builds the body for, sweet wood work. My Legacys were done in Ash Burl and that was difficult to give up. 

Good luck choosing coming to your final decision, it's not easy I know. The good news is that no matter your choice you'll end up with an amazing pair of speakers. I must admit that one of my biggest hurdles to overcome when choosing the DI's over the Legacys was price. How could a speaker at nearly a quarter of the price sound better? I'm so glad I chose the DI's, especially since I'm having so much fun driving them with the one watt LTA MZ2......musical bliss. 
Chris (Waltersalas), thanks very much for the thoroughness not only of your report, but especially for the thoroughness of the comparisons you have been performing between these two fine speakers.  Your opinions always have extremely high credibility in my book, and in this case certainly help to validate the many very positive comments others have provided about the DIs.  As well as adding an exclamation point (or three) to the remarkable value the DIs represent at their price point.

 As Mac said just above, "the good news is that no matter your choice you'll end up with an amazing pair of speakers."  In my own case, given that the comparison seems to be a close one, with each speaker having mostly subtle pluses and minuses relative to the other, and given also that my listening room is my living room, appearance would be the overriding consideration (that being equally important to both me and my wife).  (I chose the same quartersawn white oak option for my Ulysses as you did, btw).

But again, the huge price differential between the two speakers further reinforces the remarkable achievement the DIs represent.

Thanks again.  Best regards,
-- Al