I agree with those who prefer plasma for picture quality. A well calibrated plasma has superior color accuracy, quicker response time (less odd blurring of moving images) and superior black level (very important). The primary drawback is that the pixel structure is much more evident if you sit close and look for it. I also tend to see more mosquito noise with plasma, but again, when looking for it and not when just enjoying the picture.
I've noticed that some of the larger screen LCD sets that have multiple backlight sources tend, as they age, to develop uneven lighting so that one part of the screen seems brighter than the other.
Another hang on the wall option are the very shallow DLP sets (around 7" thick). They are surprisingly good, with reasonably sharp images at the edges (should be the achilles heal with such a short focal length).
The next big thing, supposedly, are SED sets. These promise the superio black level of old CRT sets and extremely fast response time.
I've noticed that some of the larger screen LCD sets that have multiple backlight sources tend, as they age, to develop uneven lighting so that one part of the screen seems brighter than the other.
Another hang on the wall option are the very shallow DLP sets (around 7" thick). They are surprisingly good, with reasonably sharp images at the edges (should be the achilles heal with such a short focal length).
The next big thing, supposedly, are SED sets. These promise the superio black level of old CRT sets and extremely fast response time.