How do you determine how much to spend on speakers

In my system,I spent about half my budget on speakers,about a quarter for amplification,and about a quarter for sources. I used supplied innerconnects and 16g hearter cord from the hardware store as speaker wire.

I have no quibble with those who would break it down into thirds instead of 2 to 1 to 1.

You mentioned that you are a beginner at this.I hesitate to tell you how to spend five thousand because I don't know your room or your listening preferences.

That said,for a beginner,I suggest using a search engine to find AVA (Audio by Van Alstine) and Odyssey Audio. Take the time to look over their sites and when you have any questions,e mail them,with the knowledge that they market excellent stuff for the money and will give you honest advice.

I have not heard the Biro L-1s(I'm one of those panel speaker nuts.) but I'm sure those(from AVA) and anything Klaus(from Odysssey Audio) recommend with their equipment would be fine deals for the money.

Then,when you are no longer a beginner and can put together used stuff properly,you can do well at this site.

Nrchy, I haven't said that the amplifiers are more important than the source, but that I would put more money on them. Without a good source, forget about it. The main reason to spend more money in the amplifier than the source is simple: Good amplifiers are much more expensive than good sources!

With 5K you can buy a good source.
With 5K you can only buy an average altough powerful amplifier or a fine but weak amplifier.

Intersting comments, Sony. There may be something to that. I have about $13,000 worth of front end in the TT/arm/cartridge, and about $15,000 (I think) worth of electronics for the amp. That certainly coincides with your assessment. BUT since I did not pay retail, in actual dollars there was more money spent on the front end.

Velly intaresssstingk!

IMO there is nothing in the audio chain that will change the sound of a system more than the speakers.

The best electronics in the world will not make crappy speakers sound good.

My .02 is the most on speakers, maybe half, give or take a litte. Then, nearly as much on the amp/preamp/integrated amp.

Lastly, the digital source. No doubt this is blasphemy to some but the least amount needs to go here. I'd say not necessary to spend any more than say $500, and maybe less, on a digital source.

Really, to find out for myself, I have a Benchmark DAC1 on order and I'm going to put it against a $120 Pioneer DV-588A, a Denon DCD-1560, a Denon 2900, and a Music Hall MMF CD-25. If there is much difference in digital the Benchmark DAC1 should be clearly superior. We'll see....

Whoaru99, most people that suggest source is the most important (and this apply's to digital even more so) is because you really have to spend far more then $1k to get good digital. I've heard speakers as little as $1k used that I could live with, I'm not so sure I could do that with digital.

I've heard a number of setups that were inferior using great speakers and bad electronics, I've heard good setups using decent speakers, with great electronics that sounded...good. The fact that people support digital sources or sources in general has more to do with what you just suggested, perhaps there isn't as big a difference in lower end digital and that you have to actually invest quite a lump sum to get something that resembles music, at least digitally.