Mofojo has it exactly right. I was just pointing out the irony of your posting. Clearly, that concept is far over your head. I don't know what makes you think that I am defending Tekton, I made that clear in my last post. I also said I would never buy a pair until I got to hear them and that I was not overly impressed with the pair I did get to hear. Not so hard to understand if you can comprehend English.
You can defend the measurements of the Rainmaker, but they are clearly worse than the Enzo. If you check Stereophile measurements often, you will note that most of the bass rise indicated in all of their measurements is caused by the way JA measures the speakers. He states this often in speaker measurement text explanations, even in the text of the Enzo measurements. IOW, most of the 6 db rise in the midbass can be discounted. So that leaves a regrettable, narrow band, notch at 2000 hertz. Other than that notch at 2k, the measured frequency response is not too bad, and JA says so at the end of the review. Take the midbass hump from the Rainmaker and they still measure poorly with a 12 db swing. BTW, the Enzo xl is a $2100 speaker, not $3000. You keep crossing models up. By your logic, no one should be Forest because Rainmaker measures poorly. Hey, I wasn't the one who said I couldn't live with a speaker that has a 12 db swing in frequency response because it was too colored, it was you. And guess what, you own one. Do you get the irony of your complaint yet?
