Tekton Double Impacts

imo:  feeding the DI's  with more Current or  higher watt  amps is not about the Necessity, for playing music at a  higher or a  louder level. 

the extra current gives the DI's more of a sense of "Realism"  in which  i don't  feel that lower watt (SET etc..)  amps  can not achieve!

the higher current (quality) amps make it  apparent  especially  while listening to instruments such as a piano or horns and drums  and so forth. the Music just sounds  more  Real and Faithful!

i heard the DI's  with both a lower watt  amp and a higher current amp and its a Night and Day difference in the Music Presentation  or Realism  in MY experience!   (impact, soundstage, air etc..)  

the DI's are  speakers that offer great flexibility, in terms  of  matching  with a low watt amp or higher current  no doubt about that!


My summary:

low watt amps= Clark Kent  
  (Mild-mannered man)


Higher current (quality) amps= Superman 
(you know the story...)


Cheers.....




 


   



    

I would have to totally disagree with a night and day difference between high pwr amps and low pwr amps with the DI's.

I have probably used more different amps in comparison than anyone else that I know of,the 1.4 watts from the MZ2S to 700 watts class d from the ps audio mono's.

I have found the differences in power to mainly effect the bass presentation with tighter and dryer bass when using higher pwr SS amps.The speakers definitely need enough pwr to be convincing and that could most definitely differ with room size,volume levels,types of music.

I have used 24 different amps with the Di speaker and I will be trying out the benchmark ahb2 this week,on loan from a local friend.

I have played the piano the majority of my life and I definitely know what's convincing and what Isn't and I base the sound of other instruments from live music.

Now if you where talking about any of the Zu audio speakers I would definitely agree with you,they do need some pwr to give them some shove or the music sounds like it's stuck in the box.

The good news is there isn't a right way or wrong way and It's up to the individual to decide.

Kenny.

Only 24 different amps with the DI’s Kenny? Slacker! :)

I’m on amp #5 with the DI’s with #6 arriving Tuesday and #7 in a couple of weeks.....both SET amps. Fun, fun, fun!

As always it comes down to perspective and personal preference.

If dynamics and tighter, controlled bass is realism to you then high powered amps would probably be preferred. If tone, timbre and texture provides realism to you then SET amps are hard to beat in that regard. I’m not implying SS can’t do tone, timbre or texture well I’ve just never heard one do it as well as a SET. The same goes for tube amps with dynamic slam and bass, they can do it quite well but I’ve not heard one that could match a good high powered SS amp. Having said all of that, just because I haven’t heard something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

As Kenny stated.....no right or way way. It’s all good and it's all fun.

@kdude66:

my observations and thoughts were based on   "MY EARS"   and not what i heard  or anything posted about the DI's!

when i said higher current amp   (clean and quality)  both tubes and SS. the DI's  produce such   "Realism" and Faithful Sound  that i found lacking with the low watt amps, just keeping it real!

We all hear different and i understand that!

so i suppose there is  no right or wrong  when pairing with the DI's?









 

Totally agree with Kenny's opinion/position on what happens as you go up in power/watts on the DI's, and the Ulf's, slight changes in bass presentation, nothing radical regarding over "aliveness" dynamics and clear differences in tonality/color depending if you are using tubes or solid state amps.  Since both speakers are easy to drive conduits, I much prefer tubes in general and SET amps specifically because of what they have to offer in timbres/tonality, meaty 3D imaging, and spatial dimensions.

To be quite frank/honest, with no disrespect to anyone, I find that many so-called audiophiles and reviewers need to play their systems at very high volume levels because over the years they have really screwed up their ability to hear high frequencies at realistic volume levels because of the many years of setting in front of their system at unsafe/harmful dB levels.  Ever time I have gone to shows my first request virtually in ever room is could you please turn down the volume.  Because I'm spoiled reviewer, instead of copping an attitude they often oblige.  When I'm invited to other listener's home to hear the music through their system I also almost always am requesting to turn down the volume.

In all systems because of many factors their is going to be a "sweet spot" were all the dynamics are present, along with realistic sound-staging/layering, and finally the size of the individual players.  My major way of dialing in that sweet spot is the size of months of singers, and if a trumpet becomes four feet long its time to reduce the volume.  As a system reaches reference level performance the "sweet spot" becomes more precise with each recording and sometimes has to be reset on different selections on the same recording because the sound engineer did some changes from cut to cut.  So many times I have sat in front of systems that are playing at possible damaging dB levels with prefect clarity and dynamics but the snare drum sounds like it is the size of a bath tube!  Please turn it down is my quick request to the owner of the system.