mr m,
The issue here is the poor job that Tidal itself does at creating a central repository for MQA titles.
Why should paying customers have to resort to a spreadsheet to identify MQA titles, or worse, only find them by happenstance?
The "Masters" section of Tidal as such a central library of MQA titles is a joke. Appears to me that the same despots that select titles to highlight in the "New" (non-mqa) section of Tidal are in charge of the Masters Section as well. At least 50% of the titles added weekly to the Masters section are virtually unlistenable from a sound quality standpoint. As for the musical value of same, well I will just leave it at, "It is not my taste".
There are exceptions of course and infrequently a real gem gets included, but it is a rarity and seems to be getting worse over time, IMO.
We appear to have made a major mistake by inferring that Tidal MQA=audiophile/music aficionado.
Dave
The issue here is the poor job that Tidal itself does at creating a central repository for MQA titles.
Why should paying customers have to resort to a spreadsheet to identify MQA titles, or worse, only find them by happenstance?
The "Masters" section of Tidal as such a central library of MQA titles is a joke. Appears to me that the same despots that select titles to highlight in the "New" (non-mqa) section of Tidal are in charge of the Masters Section as well. At least 50% of the titles added weekly to the Masters section are virtually unlistenable from a sound quality standpoint. As for the musical value of same, well I will just leave it at, "It is not my taste".
There are exceptions of course and infrequently a real gem gets included, but it is a rarity and seems to be getting worse over time, IMO.
We appear to have made a major mistake by inferring that Tidal MQA=audiophile/music aficionado.
Dave