2. speakers
  3. 128578-80822

Tekton Double Impacts

Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
Sbayne,
I know what you mean by supporting local musicians.  Each time I attend a performance I'd like to believe that the money spent contributes to their continued survival.  I have such enormous admiration for their talent and mastery of their respective instruments.  Also to be truthful it evokes the "man wish I could play like that" response every time 😊. At the core of it all I'm just a music loving guy. 
Charles 
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
Hi Jcarcopo, 
I am also an advocate of the "keep it simple " philosophical approach when it comes to components and the audio signal pathway. So I admit the contradiction in preferring the inclusion of a high quality tube preamplifier.  Despite adding active  circuitry to the pathway,  they just give more than they remove in my listening experiences.  

This is only my opinion and Lord knows that this topic has been covered ad nauseum 😊. I find myself firmly planted in the active preamplifier camp.
Charles  
sbayne's avatar
sbayne
493 posts
 

@charles1dad - "So I admit the contradiction in preferring the inclusion of a high quality tube preamplifier.  Despite adding active  circuitry to the pathway,  they just give more than they remove in my listening experiences. "

+1. Totally agree.

"I know what you mean by supporting local musicians.  Each time I attend a performance I'd like to believe that the money spent contributes to their continued survival.  I have such enormous admiration for their talent and mastery of their respective instruments.  Also to be truthful it evokes the "man wish I could play like that" response every time 😊. At the core of it all I'm just a music loving guy. "

Exactly!


jcarcopo's avatar
jcarcopo
504 posts
 
@charles1dad  - Great, now I need a tube preamplifier. 😂  The Vinnie Rossi LIO DHT, possibly with their DAC2 upgrade makes me salivate, but I'm out of kidneys to sell.  It's simply out of my reach. In your opinion, what's a decent tube preamplifier for the money? Anything out there that offers the bang for buck performance of the DIs in a preamplifier?  My audio budget is exhausted at the moment from the hit I took recently on an investment I made and my recently built system set me back a lot,  but at least I can start setting funds aside for a preamp.  We have similiar tastes, so what's your suggestion? 
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
Jcarcopo,
Do you have a particular budget range? Yes, based on reading your posts over a period of time I do believe that we have very similar listening dispositions. It seems we both appreciate the "natural" or organic sound of good tube components but avoid the gratuitous artificial warmth coloration of lesser tube designs. There is a hierarchy in the tube equipment universe.
Charles
More to discover