Picking an amplifier


I have the following speakers:
NHT 2.1 Front LR 200W @ 6ohms
NHT AC1 Center 150W @ 8 ohms
NHT SW2 Subwoofer 200W @ 8 ohms
The rear speakers are inconsequential (and boxed up) they might come out to play when I move to bigger digs.
I’ve been using NHTs 214s and 216s, (think lightbulbs) but the market is drying up. I remain unconvinced they are worth the shipping & costs to repair.
My (current) short list of replacement amps:
Outlaw Audio model 770 7 (7 channels)
Bryston 9B ST (5 channels) (2 years left on warranty)
Parasound 5125 (5 channels)
The budget is $1000, I have located sources for all three at or below $1000.
Any/all discussion of suitability, repair outlook, and peanut shells welcome. From a listening perspective, I've been fine with the NADs, but am priced out of the newer models. Nuts, I might even repair the NADs if I find the right person with the skills & tools.

shalmaneser
auxie, baby - you have a secret identity as a product reviewer? Or is this your secret identity when you’re hiding from the fangirls?

I frequently run older drivers in compatibility mode. Usually success is a case-by-case issue. I have a soundblaster USB card and (well, they recently updated the drivers from customer pressure) xbox controllers. 
Wow auxinput, this was a really interesting description of the differences between 2 and multi-channel inputs via coax and HDMI.  I have an Arcam receiver that does really well with either analog inputs or HDMI hires from Bluray.  My transport has the option to output "raw bitstream" or "PCM" data, and I have a very clear preference for raw bitstream.  But the 2channel Redbook output to the DACs in the Arcam via HDMI sounds much less engaging than Bluray through HDMI or 2channel redbook out to external DAC via optical cable and back into the Arcam via analog Interconnect.  I couldn't figure out why the character of the sound of the same DACs in the receiver was SO different between low and hi res recordings, and why the same redbook recordings (from the same transport!) sounded so different between the receiver's built in DACs and the external DAC.  The character of the external DAC for all resolutions and sources (CDs/optical, Tidal or JRiver/USB) of material was closer to the very fine sound of Bluray recordings processed by the Arcam receiver.  Redbook content via HDMI just sounded flat or compressed compared to Redbook via optical.  I attributed this to the DACs in the Arcam being optimized for higher res source material, but now I am not so sure it isn't the HDMI interface.
auxinput: edit: I have the Sound Blaster USB external box - the original. TOSLINK before people could spell it! Sometime in the last couple of years they started cranking out updates to the thing like a Pez dispenser! For years they had done NOTHING with the USB external. 
I've been auditing PC A/V players. So far nothing stands up to Jriver. The differences between players can be astonishing. It looks like Jriver could use some more work on their user interface, but that could be said about any program. Joke: any program that is complete is obsolete. Given your analysis of HDMI & optical/coax, I'm probably going to be investing in more stuff. 

I have used JRiver for several years now and I love it.  It is highly configurable.  If you have a weird driver/pc/audio situation, odds are that JRiver can be configured to work with it.  It supports kernel streaming modes (which may or may not work for you).  I currently use Kernal streaming to the Asus Xonar Digital coax output and it sounds better than other modes.  These modes will bypass the Windows DirectSound driver layer (which is bad and it forces all audio to one sampling rate output).

It also supports playing audio through asio4all driver, which I needed to do when I was outputting to USB.  I'm sure you can do other configurations.  The DSP stack is awesome, if you need it. 

I have heard that JPlay is also has great performance, but since I started with JRiver, I never looked at other software.

I wonder where you will end up with all this. lol.