Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Yeah, those tracks should be fine for testing bass. They have a steady bass line all the way through. I don't think dynamics has anything to do with it. They are studio recordings, which is mostly what I listen to, and it's also why I ask people what kind of music they listen to when choosing tube amps, because if it's open, airy, live recordings, certain tubes might not work well with polyphonic, dense studio recordings.

@aniwolfe  - I can test the same tracks when I get home and realign my speakers. I know them very well.

Do you have your speakers on stands/platforms at all? I know you're using room correction, so you need to be careful that it doesn't suck the bass right out of the recordings. Chris Squire's bass has a lot of mids in it, while Sting has a much more traditional sound.

It need not be "audiophile quality." I've found that there are audiophile elements in almost every recording, live, or studio. One just needs to know what to listen to, and what to listen FOR. In fact, one might not even know what their speakers are fully capable of if they are always listening to the usual suspects.

I was talking to Aric and we both agreed that hear what your speaker/amp (possibly DAC) combo is capable of, one needs to put on some super dense recordings, with a lot going on. It's not that something needs to always be pure in its timbre and tone, merely that the instruments need to be pure within the context of the mix.

Me, I like to be able to listen to every kind of music on the planet, so I know if my speakers and amp can fully "decode" Metallica, some of those early well-recorded Iron Maiden albums, some Prince, with those lo-res Linn drum beats, and YES' Tales From Topographic Oceans, then I know that my Mozart, my solo Neil Young, and my Cannonball Adderley will be in good hands.

This method has never let me down.  
@greg22lz Please do report back on the new speaker cables.  I have the anti-cables and have been thinking about trying your replacement.
@evolvist

My speakers are set using the provided spikes into Herbie Hush Puckies.
I agree about the room correction. I seem to have enough bass in general. Was just curious if DI owners have bass with resolution? You need upper to mid bass otherwise its not going to be easy to follow complex passages. Most posters seem to comment on how Dynamic the bass is or isn’t.

Another Track :
Paul Simon’s "You can call me Al"
Genesis "No reply at all"
Aniwolfe
geberally speaking, most of what I listen to has good articulate defined bass. I will listen to some of these tracks to see what I hear.
greg
cal3713 & greg22lz, please remember that Paul now has a Level 5 speaker cable of silver, expensive but the systems I've heard it in were superb.