If it ain’t all about sonics and it seems within this list it ain’t, it must be about something else as significant.
Perhaps ‘audiophile’ means more in different cultural settings. What Hi Fi is to my understanding an ‘off shore’ magazine, isn’t it? Maybe they feel ‘eclectic’ is as congruent to audiophile as is excellence is to sonics.
Did anyone look into the actual choices as to each prominence or uniqueness or even influence, or in other words an albums entymology, its musicians recording venues, and or producers?
Not digging at anyone, just wondering aloud.
Could be too, as with so many top 10 or top 100 lists on various tV shows, the list is aimed primarily at crating controversy. I see this occur on Nat Geo, Hist. AHC, etc., all the time.
Beats me. If only a few items on the list appear audiophile by definition which have not been known before, then you are ahead of the game for not much effort at all, right? I saw they said something about just that thing too, “finding new stuff”. Broadening your musical horizons.
Could be just that simple.