Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Understood. These changes have nothing to do with price points, cap brands, or upgraded parts like wire and binding posts. Not a question of these things at all. Simply crossover design and wild differences in just a period on months. 1.5uf cap in series with the center tweet vs a cap more than 4x that value! 100uf cap in series with mid drivers vs. 220uf with same value inductor. Additional inductor on some outer tweets not found in other DI sets. All these things CHANGE the sound. Many, many more I won’t mention. Even wiring mids and woofers out of phase on some sets and not others. Trust me I can go on and on. Nothing here to do with price points. Just sharing our DI speakers sound different based on birthdate.  Mine are 08/17 DIs.  
Post removed 
@grannyring - Ok, got it. If I had known that was going on I may not have purchased these speakers. That's why you pointing this out is so important.
I think I would assume the TD continually strives for excellence in his products! 
I assume they do to. I agree 100%.  I would still buy from them as I love his spirit of innovation and product.  I do wish the design was more “finished” before intro however.  Again, I point this out so we know we will hear differences in our DIs.  While the sheer degree and amount of change makes me scratch my head, I don’t think it means the DI speaker is not a great speaker. It is a great speaker and one that is certainly evolving in a speedy fashion.