Do you listen mainly to Audiophile CDs and records?

I’m happy and somewhat surprised to hear that the overwhelming majority in this thread deny that sound is a prime factor in determining what they listen to.
After all, this is an audiophile forum.  One would expect sound to play a more important part than most people admit.

I am similarly pleased to see that, but not that surprised. If you look at the genre that many seem to be listening to, it is often 60’s and 70’s rock. Sadly, that music was rarely recorded very well, and never on modern gear.
With classical music you also have the great interpretations from the past, but these are only interpretations - they are not originals. We don’t have Bach himself playing the organ, etc. So the older interpretations have to compete with more recent ones that may have been recorded better, but are perhaps also based on better musicological research as in the case of more authentic recordings of baroque music.

My priority is always the music first. I have everything from bootlegs to MQA. I would hate to think I missed a great performance or great music because I wouldn't listen to it. Sure I love sound quality but, I have listened to poor quality boots to hear a stellar performance!

RV, I expect that the Telefunken set is rather rare. I bought mine at the Ring Festival in Seattle, where it was recommended in hushed tones. And at the cost, it should have been. Even so, it's been a good bargain; 35 years and still quiet as a Seattle Ring audience.

@willemj 

And yet sometimes the old recordings are just magically better. I'm thinking of the first complete major piece recorded in stereo, Beethoven's Emperor, performed by Gieseking in 1944 (sic, 1944), released by Varese. 

The performance is just qualitatively superior to any other, including subsequent recordings by Gieseking himself. There's something about hearing anti-aircraft cannon as a counterpoint, that brings the whole Emperor thing into perspective.