Thiel Owners

65
While I've been into vinyl for 40 years , cassettes before that ,
I've only been " at it " seriously for the last 10 .
Learned a lot from a friend nkonor but never really applied it until
recently , the kids are grown ( still costing me with education expenses  )
and I have reached an income level that I can spend on my hobby.
Wish I started a few years earlier , vinyl has gone up in price,
but at the same time equipment has improved by leaps and bounds.

For Black Friday I purchased acoustic panels from Acoustimac
to replace my homemade piecemeal setup , waiting for delivery !

I’m freaking 60, very soon to turn 61, and since becoming a member on this lunatic site around 4 years ago I’ve burned through quite a few dollars on everything in the most futile of pursuits - perfection.  

Obviously my chronological advance has not yet graced me with wisdom. I doubt it ever will, perhaps when I cease advancing I may find it. 

Anyway - as close to a reasonable facsimile of perfection as one may get in this hobby is Thiel. 
Speakers HAVE to cost more than these to be better - and from my limited “high end” auditions over the last few years the only other manufacturer that comes even close is Magnepan.  I’m a fan of both.  I simply can’t find sonic or financial reasons sufficient to consider blowing a few thousand bucks on other brands that might do one or even a couple of things “better”,  especially when none in my $$ wheelhouse do everything as well as Thiel does. 

IMHO Pass Labs  and Thiel represent amazing sonics. I’m still trying to get my 3.6’s to shine as my 3.5’s did.  I don’t think I’ll be getting there soon.  I may be selling my 3.6’s to find another pair of 3.5’s.  Something about those suckers that connects with me where the 3.6’s do not. 

To each his own. 

As long as it’s Thiel!

Sorry unsound - for some reason I thought you had the 3.6s, not the 3.5s..

oblgny - just curious what you like better about the 3.5s then the 3.6s?  

As for me, I'm 46.  I started early when I mowed lawns to get a pair of Adcom separates and Canton speakers.  Been hooked ever since..

dhoff01...

Ya' know,  describing the difference between the 3.5 and 3.6 models is something that I thought would be less than it really is,  but the fact of the matter is that these are VERY different speakers.  And far more different than moving "up" as I did from 2.0,  2.2,  and 2.3 to the 3.5's.  In those earlier examples the differences merely improved on everything that endeared Thiel to me from the get-go,  accuracy,  colorlessness,  and most specifically,  bass reproduction that felt like,  sounded like bass without exaggeration.  

I keep saying that I'm not a "bass" fiend,  finding most speakers reproduction of it artificial and cartoonish - for lack of a better term.  I'm also a pretty big fan of Magnepan,  so my ears do favor midrange and highs to begin with.


I used a Pass Labs X150.5/BAT tubed pre setup for  my 3.5's,  and I am currently - no pun intended - using a BAT integrated.  Either setup provided 150 watts into 8 ohms,  300 into 4 ohm loads which either Thiel is rated.  To my ears the 3.6's just don't pressurize the room the way the 3.5's did.  I'm also finding that the highs on the 3.6's seem diminished - odd considering that some people describe Thiels as "too bright."


I think that the 3.6's do require a more significant amount of power to truly shine.  At levels louder than I normally listen at they do begin to strut their proverbial stuff.  But,  alas,  my listening evil is very conservative and I believe the 3.5's just presented everything better at lower volumes than the 3.6's are wont to - again,  my humble opinion.


Thiel improves ANY setup one may have.  I've tossed a bevy of amps at them,  Pass Labs,  Threshold,  Primare,  Audio Research,  Conrad Johnson,  McIntosh...this site has drained my bank account a few times in the last 4 years.


I just put my 3.6's up for sale here on the site.  Right now I'm downsizing,  returning to tubes, looking at more efficient Thiels - if that's possible.

oblgny,

I hope some day you get a chance to try the 3.7s in your system.  Apparently Jim was deliberately going for a higher efficiency than previous Thiels (Stereophile measure it just under 91.dB).  The impedance was low, but as I've said many times on this thread, the Thiels have been amazingly happy being driven by my CJ amps, and even my Eico 14W side. 

And the 2.7s despite being 87 dB efficient are dynamic and punchy as hell on the CJ amps.

My listening levels are conservative as well.   But I have to say my listening levels have crept up these days because the Thiels are so smooth and fun to listen to, and can sound so "live."