I've been experimenting a fair amount over the past week. At first, I was running the tank around 40-43 degrees Celsius, for 3 turns @ 7 mins/turn. So 21 minutes total. After reading more on the VPI forums, I decided to try Harry's recommendation of no heat (other than cavitation generated) and increasing the rotation speed. So I have been doing 10 minutes without heat @ 4.5 mins/rotation. Really, there's not much perceivable difference. It's a bit of apples to oranges or I'd say there is no difference. Although some records are going to need another bath because they still have a fair amount of pops and ticks. But this was even the case at 21 minutes. They are probably just beyond cleaning. What I don't agree with on the other forum thread is the loss of highs. Even at high heat for 21 minutes, I immediately noticed the opposite - increased upper treble extension. So maybe my gear isn't quite good enough to notice a loss in highs or maybe it's simply not happening (I suspect the latter). I think I've cleaned about 80 records so far. Still a loooong way to go.
Thumbs up for ultrasonic record cleaning
My Cleaner Vinyl ultrasonic record cleaner arrived today and it’s impressive.
Everything I’d read indicated that ultrasonic was the way to go, and now I count myself among the believers. Everything is better - records are quieter, less ticks and pops, more detail etc.
All my records had been previously cleaned with a vacuum record cleaner and were well cared for. Nonetheless, the difference is obvious and overwhelmingly positive.
Phil
Everything I’d read indicated that ultrasonic was the way to go, and now I count myself among the believers. Everything is better - records are quieter, less ticks and pops, more detail etc.
All my records had been previously cleaned with a vacuum record cleaner and were well cared for. Nonetheless, the difference is obvious and overwhelmingly positive.
Phil
- ...
- 373 posts total
- 373 posts total