https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2H7NZ0GNIIE
There! It worked!
Duke: Fabulous! 27 (!) choruses by Paul Gonzalves. Besides being a amazing musical feat, it should not go unnoticed what a feat of physical endurance it was. Special moment in jazz history. And you’re right about Duke’s reed section; very unique sound. What was special about the way that Duke and Strayhorn wrote for that reed section was that the writing was not generic. That is not intended as a criticism of other reed sections which were written for to emphasize blend and cohesion; like a vocal group harmonizing as you correctly pointed out. Duke wrote for his reed section in a way that capitalized on and highlighted each individual player’s unique tone and particular musical strength. One of the things that I liked most about that reed section’s sound was the prominence of the bottom as played by Harry Carney; whereas most other reed sections have an obvious emphasis on the high “lead” sound.
There! It worked!
Duke: Fabulous! 27 (!) choruses by Paul Gonzalves. Besides being a amazing musical feat, it should not go unnoticed what a feat of physical endurance it was. Special moment in jazz history. And you’re right about Duke’s reed section; very unique sound. What was special about the way that Duke and Strayhorn wrote for that reed section was that the writing was not generic. That is not intended as a criticism of other reed sections which were written for to emphasize blend and cohesion; like a vocal group harmonizing as you correctly pointed out. Duke wrote for his reed section in a way that capitalized on and highlighted each individual player’s unique tone and particular musical strength. One of the things that I liked most about that reed section’s sound was the prominence of the bottom as played by Harry Carney; whereas most other reed sections have an obvious emphasis on the high “lead” sound.