This is the benefit of a better master and not related to the MQA technology itself.Says who? Is this just your "assumption" or an actual fact? And if a fact, where did you get this information?
Also, isn't the "Master" tag on the Tidal/MQA track what makes it a "Master MQA" track? I don't know how you would ever know if the track sounded "better" because it was just a better mastered 16/44.1 track or if MQA actually makes it better.
@shadorne ...If I'm reading/understanding you right, you are adding a THIRD variable to the mix.
1. Standard CD 16/44.1 track
2. Standard CD 16/44.1 track (Better Master)
3. MQA track
Not sure if this quite right, but that's just me...