scientific double blinded cable test

That's fine, you needn't accept the observations of others. Please feel free to conduct your own blind testing, and to share the results with the forum.

Just to reiterate what I've already stated, I certainly do perform my own (with the help of an assistant) blind testing in cases where I hear (or believe I do) a difference, in order to confirm/deny my observation. 

But in cases where I'm *not* the one making a claim to hear a difference - and wire directionality is one such case - then in my view the onus ought to placed on the person (Geoff) making such claim, not the one (me) disputing it. 

gdhal

... the onus ought to placed on the person (Geoff) making such claim, not the one (me) disputing it.

Sorry, but no one here is obligated to test anything for your benefit.

Sorry, but no one here is obligated to test anything for your benefit.

@cleeds

No apology necessary.

You should know, I happen to agree with you (quoted above) completely.

Thing is, it’s my assertion that the "benefit" actually lies with the person making the claim, not with the person disputing it.

And please know, in no way am I intentionally wanting to be obstinate in my thinking here. But being able to hear a difference when speaker wire is reversed? Seriously? And to write that in a thread devoted to "scientific double blinded cable test". How *un-scientific" can that statement be? LOL.

At NASA there is a strict regulation to observe directionality of cables. Otherwise
false discoveries could result like that at CERN where some neutrinos were faster than light.

At NASA there is a strict regulation to observe directionality of cables. Otherwise false discoveries could result like that at CERN where some neutrinos were faster than light.

Hi @nugat

And are the cables NASA uses where they must conform to strict regulation to observe directionality used as audio speaker wire?