It's more like I know what's not supposed to be audible.
Like Douglas, I’m still unclear how it is you know “what’s not supposed to be audible.”
Two Type of sound and listener preference are there more?
If it’s on the recording it got there somehow. It’s ‘supposed to be there’. Go listen to older jazz like the Swedish Jazz at the Pawn Shop. Audiophile recording. You here the glasses clicking and can almost smell the smoke in your room. Musical as heck and on a great system just fun to listen to. Musical and accurate and detailed can and should all be in the same camp. Even great speakers and systems that have a different flavor can give you all of it and should. Jmho |
V would be the Wilson gear. Very fun with the new tweeter. The IEM folks LOVE the various fun curves as they can afford to won a few different sounding ones. Heck, Empire Ears www.empireears.com has two new full lines making it three lines of all price ranges that have totally different types of sounds. That's like Wilson, Vandersteen, B&W and Magico all having three totally different lines of speakers in all price ranges from 1k to 100k adn they all have different curves to them. Where would one keep all of them? Pretty obvious that with so many posts, there are so many types of sound folks like. Great thread. |
@lwal22 Beautifully represented. And a really important distinction. "an expression of...and a communication of that perception" ....Finally understanding that, for me, it is a photograph I’m creating, not a record of what was in front of me at the the time. but rather an expression of my perception of that reality. And a communication of that perception. i find the reproduction of music very similar. In the end it is an interpretation of the performance we hear.... |