almarg wrote,
”I would expect that unrecognized extraneous variables, for example differences in equipment warmup states, differences in AC voltage and noise characteristics, differences in room temperature or humidity (temperature is a fundamental parameter in the physics underlying the operation of semiconductors such as transistors, diodes, and integrated circuit chips), flushing of internal digital memory that occurs when power is cycled, etc., are responsible for **some** of the reported benefits.”
>>>>Another illogical argument. Why is it illogical, you ask? Because the reported benefits of fancy fuses occur IN SPITE of those unknown variables, differences in warm up states, differences in room temperature or humidity, or the underlying physics of anything, etc., NOT (rpt not) BECAUSE OF THEM. That’s the advantage of having a very large CONFIRMED user population on the order of many tens of thousands who have almost all had POSITIVE RESULTS. Those positive results were obviously obtained in every possible situation, not only the ones you refer to but many others. Thus, without further ado, I hereby throw all the negative results out. You know, Wolfie, Mapman, whoever.
”I would expect that unrecognized extraneous variables, for example differences in equipment warmup states, differences in AC voltage and noise characteristics, differences in room temperature or humidity (temperature is a fundamental parameter in the physics underlying the operation of semiconductors such as transistors, diodes, and integrated circuit chips), flushing of internal digital memory that occurs when power is cycled, etc., are responsible for **some** of the reported benefits.”
>>>>Another illogical argument. Why is it illogical, you ask? Because the reported benefits of fancy fuses occur IN SPITE of those unknown variables, differences in warm up states, differences in room temperature or humidity, or the underlying physics of anything, etc., NOT (rpt not) BECAUSE OF THEM. That’s the advantage of having a very large CONFIRMED user population on the order of many tens of thousands who have almost all had POSITIVE RESULTS. Those positive results were obviously obtained in every possible situation, not only the ones you refer to but many others. Thus, without further ado, I hereby throw all the negative results out. You know, Wolfie, Mapman, whoever.
