Frogman, I have pointed out MY observations not yours. Maybe their stylistic differences are so great that I don't consider them good jazz.
Why are the best examples you display are of them playing Mingus's music?
Jazz for aficionados
O-10, thanks for your comments. I don’t understand an “observation” of something that cannot be there. The issue of whether current players are improvising or not is not a matter of observation it is a matter of fact or not; and it is a very simple matter to establish. I have no issue with you not liking the way that modern players play, but I think they at least deserve credit for what they are in fact doing. I don’t understand the comment about Mingus. Those examples may be the best for you, but I don’t understand the relevance here. I would appreciate some clarification on this and perhaps some clips of examples of prominent modern players in which you feel that their solos are “written down”. Feels like we have done a complete about face on the issue of modern players. I hope not. Btw, re Aaron Diehl’s style and your question: what are your thoughts? Again, some really great comments by nsp, bluesy, pjw and pryso as well. I think that the spirit of the “ESSENCE” of jazz that nsp talks about is something worth striving for as listeners. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V69Flv9XqA0 Future jazz standard?: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CzJ7jLAn4Iw |
bluesy41 Well spoken we ARE blessed and let's enjoy the music. The answer to your question : we are nothing without music. Maybe you are onto something when you say that artists in the past recycled songs more often giving different versions and maybe today's artists do not do this to the same degree. Maybe only after having your peers play your song(s) many times will a pieceor body http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rPkr5QOwqgg of music be then considered to be a jazz "standard". I am not sure and hope others weigh in on the subject. older & live G Benson: |
**** Maybe only after having your peers play your song(s) many times will a pieceor body of music be then considered to be a jazz "standard". **** That’s exactly right. It becomes a jazz “standard” because players like to play a certain tune and the tune becomes part of the jazz lexicon over time. Not all tunes lend themselves to jazz interpretation nor are they necessarily good vehicles for jazz improvisation. Players like tunes with a good melody, but also with interesting harmonic changes that have a certain musical logic to them. Or, as in the case of modal jazz (KOB), they have a “simplicity” or economy of harmonic movement that, in a way, opens up more possibilities to the improviser as he is not bound to the constantly changing harmonic backdrop. At the other end of the spectrum, sometimes players simply like the challenge of a tune like “Giant Steps” which, more than anything, is a test of a player’s ability to “think” VERY quickly on his feet with its very fast changing harmonies. |
Post removed |