We Need A Separate Forum for Fuses

Can someone please remind me what the topic of this thread was !!

Hi @cleeds 

First, my apology as I meant to write "respectfully" instead of "respectively". No matter, you get the idea :)

I think the changes that might result from reversing the orientation of a fuse would be a lot more subtle than discriminating between Bob Dylan and Amy Winehouse. The test you're describing is nowhere near rigorous enough to reliably reveal such differences, and I suspect you know that.

Consider the operative word you are using - "subtle". Now consider many folks are clearly writing "major", "not so subtle" and other descriptors instead of the just the word subtle. I see/hear nothing wrong with the "blinded" Amy > Bob > Amy > Bob test I describe. In fact, I would have to think you and others would *want* to do a blind test in the manner I describe, even if merely to substantiate your belief. This is what I did when I purchased a DAC. Why wouldn't you/others do this when reversing a fuse/wire?

gdhal

I see/hear nothing wrong with the "blinded" Amy > Bob > Amy > Bob test I describe.

Understood, but as I explained, a lot of research shows that quick switching is required for a valid listening test.

In fact, I would have to think you and others would *want* to do a blind test in the manner I describe, even if merely to substantiate your belief. This is what I did when I purchased a DAC. Why wouldn’t you/others do this when reversing a fuse/wire?

I've already told you: I don’t have a belief. I haven’t switched the orientation of a fuse or wire, so I have no reason to test it.

@cleeds 

Fair enough. Then, given the recent communication, I'd imagine you might consider extending an apology to me for using the word "fraud" numerous times. What we have is a simple disagreement as to how any kind of testing would be performed. No right or wrong per se, just a difference of opinion. Thanks.

The very best “Fuse” is no Fuse.

Kenny.