Dear Lew, This is not the first time that you try to explain ''what
Raul is trying to say''. Either Raul is no capable to explain what
he thinks or you know better what he thinks than himself.
However by ascribing some thoughts to him it is not clear what
your own are. Have you chosen your tonearms ''in concert with
peculiar carts'' or based on all kinds of sources available to you?
We usually assume many things as known because explicit
enumeration of ''arguments'' would be boring.
I already mentioned that this thread was confusing and used
the opposition between numerical (5) and universal quantors
as example. As is usual the case we got the chance to name and
praise our ''old beloved stuff''' + the new stuff. Raul used this
occasion to point out who according to him is stupid and ignorant.
I assume that you wanted to save his... as usual.