2. speakers
  3. 135508-111507

Why do I see more Vandersteen model 3s vs model 2s for sale?

Just wondering about something I've noticed on the audiogon.com website over the past few months. It seems when Vandersteen speakers pop-up for sale a good percentage of them are the model 3's. Based off what I know about Vandersteen it seems like there should be a lot more Model 2's for sale based off of overall units sold. Anyone else notice this? What could be the reason?
I currently have the Model 2c's (SNs around 27K, I believe) and they are a great speaker. When I upgrade I either want the latest version of the model 2 (2ce sig II's) used, or used Model 3a sigs (also the latest version). I think the pricing would be somewhere in the ballpark of 1.8k for the 2ce sig IIs vs around 2.4k for the 3a sigs.
Would I be better or getting the model 2's or springing an extra $700 on the model 3's?
Just wanted to get some input on this. 3A sigs seem like the logical choice, but seeing so many for sale compared to the model 2's make me hesitant. Thanks for any insight.
bstatmeister
yogiboy's avatar
yogiboy
5,671 posts
 
I just could not get them sounding good in my listening room. I needed to tilt them almost at a 70 degree angle to get some decent bass. They were very placement critical compared to the smaller 2c’s. But you might not have this problem in your room. But I sure did!
bstatmeister OP
537 posts
 
In the past few months I have never seen a 2wq, I will be interested to see what the price is on those once they trickle in from the folks who upgrade to the SUB 3. Right now I see a couple abused regular 2Ws for $500. But intuition tells me to stay away from those.
bstatmeister OP
537 posts
 
I just could not get them sounding good in my listening room. I needed to tilt them almost at a 70 degree angle to get some decent bass. They were very placement critical compared to the smaller 2c’s. But you might not have this problem in your room. But I sure did!
I would really love to demo to get a good comparison, unfortunately there isn't a dealer with a Vandersteen set-up in Oregon (closest one is in Tacoma!). To be fair, we do have a Vandersteen dealer, but they only order them in, you can actually listen to them at their shop.
bstatmeister OP
537 posts
 
If I were to do it again. I would just buy a pair of used Quatro’s, but being less than affluent, I would suggest buying a pair of used 2wq subs for your 2c’s. That would give you 80% of a 3a sig. (Also, the 3a sig Sound Anchors stick out and make positioning difficult in cramped areas).
When money comes available, you can do what I did, buy a pair of Treo’s and keep the 2wq’s. That way you will get 90% of a Quatro. If you can find a pair of Treo CT-even better.
Vandersteen is coming out with a new sub system, so prices of the 2wq’s will probably be coming down. In any case, the 2wq’s are no slouch and integrate seamlessly.
Just so I understand this correctly, you think that the 2C’s with qty 2 2wq ’s only get you 80% of the 3a? The 3a doesn’t have this good of bass does it?
audioconnection
1,271 posts
 
Let’s think for a minute .
In order to take full advantage of the bigger speaker one would need to optimize with better electronics to climb to an obviously better level then add in decent AQ cables no band aids and a normal size room to breath and the 3A sigs can sing easily outperforming most other types
The newer Treo"CTs has a better transition and placement advantage over both speakers the latest 2 Sig 2 is still
one of the best values in speaker land
JohnnyR
More to discover