A Question on Speaker Driver Efficiency

Thanks, Kijanki.  Here's another interesting quote, this one from the thread Tim referred to above:

CJ1965 4-19-2018
For some people, "results" means using antiquated 80 year old technology that is highly vulnerable to changes in performance depending on what it's connected to. And for some folks, the lack of bass and exaggerated highs, coupled with increased harmonic distortion when using this ancient "technology" is "pleasing" or "desirable". Similarly, others see the pops and ticks, rapid wear, uneven high frequency performance, limited dynamic range, increased distortion, wow, and flutter associated with ancient vinyl technology as "more authentic". Unfortunately, we can't confine such individuals who promote and buy this junk to padded cells. We pretty much have to create invisible "padded cells" that effectively allow ourselves to ignore them.

Best regards,
-- Al
 

This is exact quote from cj1965 post:

In theory, half the voltage applied to a driver will result in half the sound pressure in the output (-3db).

Res ipsa loquitur, huh?

Obviously he didn't actually do the math, but based this on belief instead- the exact thing of which he was accusing others...

For a single driver : The change in dB in input voltage is equal to the change in output SPL in dB.

Voltage dB can be calculated in this fashion: 

dB = 20 x log ( Vnew / Vold )

in the case of half the voltage:

20 x log ( 1 / 2 ) ~= (- 6 dB)

Also, you can use this handy web gizmo:

http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-gainloss.htm

Also, we are so far from the OP's original topic, maybe we should let this thread just die. :) 

@cj1965 and other Respected and Valued contributors to this forum. cj1965 is obviously well schooled in the math, a stickler for precision, and interested in the truth of the matter. I believe/hope his knowledge “could” become valued here. However, “manners” are vital in order to become a “respected and Valued” member of any reasonable group. “Anyone” can have a misstep or slip up. We’re human. Such an event “does not” necessarily diminish one’s value or credibility. I’ll mention Ralph here as he is known to produce exceptionally listenable and prized audio equipment under the ATMASPHERE label; and is without doubt a valued contributor. 
However, harsh criticism, or sarcasm, is “generally recognized” as a deliberate attempt to demean a person.
Reasonable and compassionate people will/may react to defend the person(s) subject to the personal attacks. 
This has occurred here. 
I don’t support a ban of the offender at this time. He may have been having a “bad day(s) for reasons unknown. I do believe apologies are “generally accepted”; and are a good response to a correction of a error in a “statements of fact”, even if semantics are causing the misunderstanding, as well as for “personal insults”. Unfortunately, insults are more unacceptable than factual errors(which can always be corrected!). Insults, even if based on accurate facts, cannot be corrected. They linger in the minds of all. I highly recommend the high road of, at the minimum, a general apology for insulting comments. And best wishes to all. Peter