Any thoughts?
Simaudio 260D - As transport
Since I have digital Mcintosh digital pre with an excellent internal DAC I am considering to upgrade my Cambridge Audio CXC with Simudio 260D transport without the optional DAC .
Can you advise how is the 260D as a transport ? Will I notice a substantial improvement compare to my CXC ?
The 260D transport without the optional DAC won’t have the digital in connections only the out ones ?
The CXC had no issues with hybrid CDs
Is it the same with the 260D or it can read only red book format?
Can you advise how is the 260D as a transport ? Will I notice a substantial improvement compare to my CXC ?
The 260D transport without the optional DAC won’t have the digital in connections only the out ones ?
The CXC had no issues with hybrid CDs
Is it the same with the 260D or it can read only red book format?
- ...
- 17 posts total
You will get better jitter performance by adding a reclocker to your current transport. The ONLY thing that matters with a transport is jitter, nothing else. Here is the effect of the Synchro-Mesh with a typical transport: http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=154408.0 Customers feedbacks: http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=154039.0 http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=106328.0 It is also critical to use at least a 1.25m S/PDIF cable, and the best cable you can afford. Here are some cable jitter comparisons: http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=154425.0 Steve N. Empirical Audio |
- 17 posts total