Yeah, they are still on ebay from the japanese seller along with a few lower, but also nice and relatively cheap Glanz (New Old Stock) models. Great price for MFG-610LX ! Everyone can try a decent Moving Flux cart with Boron Cantilever and Line Contact stylus (from the 80s). Glanz is killing your Nagaoka MP500, new Audio-Technica MMs, new Garrott and many other modern MM cartridges of any price. For about $400 is a steal ! Then we can talk about it here.
GLANZ MFG 610LX
I have been searching for this uber rare GLANZ cartridge since mid 80´s as I missed my opportunity to purchase one when it was for sale back in the day. I knew its reputation as one of finest cartridges available but I just missed it, young and foolish I was. In the same price category, I bought SHURE V-15V-MR instead.
Now thirty years later I owe one, NOS found in a barren town near the Arctic Circle. It sounds just fantastic out of the box. I am very lucky as this model is so seriously rare.
Now thirty years later I owe one, NOS found in a barren town near the Arctic Circle. It sounds just fantastic out of the box. I am very lucky as this model is so seriously rare.
- ...
- 33 posts total
The chart in the pictures of this listing shows the Glanz MFG 610lx, one step below the Glanz 71l https://www.classicaudio.fi/product/glanz-mfg-610lx/76/ |
In the good old times when we discussed only 3 Glanz ''versions'' which I was also able to remember I was one of the ''experts'' regarding this ''brand''. Alas the nomenclature moved in the AT direction so while I still own MF 31l and MF 71 l I have no idea what they are worth at present. I must also confess that I sold my MF 61 because of hum. Back then there was just one member who ''pretended'' to own one. If this MFG 610LX is ''one step below 71 L'' I have no reason to panic. Qua cartridge collection I am still ''one step above'' chakster. |
@acman3 The chart in the pictures of this listing shows the Glanz MFG 610lx, one step below the Glanz 71l No, it’s 10 steps ahead, look at the cantilevers (Boron vs. Aluminum). 71 has Line Contact stylus, 61 and 610LX have Parabolic stylus, lower mass etc. I have owned MFG-71, even MFG-31 is better, but the MFG-610LX has unique cantilever and unique stylus tip, i think this model is very close to the MF-61 which i have. You can search for some other users comments regarding the Glanz 61 on audiogon, you will see this is way different from any other Glanz or Astatic (or anything Made by Mitachi). Here is my 61 and 71: https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/10570339_1205709682780530_1387528252583949179_n.jpg?_n... |
Chakster, I have never heard the Glanz Cartridges in question, so I am going from the chart I provided. The 71l has a slightly higher channel separation than the 610lx, which normally dictates the better cartridge. Also Frequency response deviation is tighter on the 71l versus the 610lx They both show to have the same solid diamond line contact stylus. I wish we could see the rest of the chart. I was wondering where did you learned the MFG 71L was aluminum and the 610lx was boron? Could they have been modified? Anyway, I am sure both are great, just found that chart and wanted to add it to the conversation, so we might get some of this convoluted Glanz/Astatic information correct before we die and our wives through them out. :) |
- 33 posts total