Here's a point that holds true for me, and (I believe) it does for most who have also moved to the SEs...(and the Ulfberths)...
For those who are deciding between the Double Impacts or the SEs, I encourage you to consider or, at the very least, factor this in.
Since the SEs went in system, my entire system is different than it was with the Double Impacts.
What's New: the SEs, Amplification (Pre/Amp), DAC, Renderer, Power Supply, Cabling, etc. It is a completely different system than what I had with the Double Impacts.
The exceptions: the very front end of my computer audio chain [server / network] (early in the process of also changing) and the isolation components in my system (which I may re-evaluate).
As I read posts made by other members who have the SEs, I see a similar pattern (mostly).
Our hobby is naturally one of improvement and upgrades, but I see a number of us (myself included) moving rapidly in this area. The SEs are Most Deserving of it.
For those who are deciding between the Double Impacts or the SEs, I encourage you to consider or, at the very least, factor this in.
Since the SEs went in system, my entire system is different than it was with the Double Impacts.
What's New: the SEs, Amplification (Pre/Amp), DAC, Renderer, Power Supply, Cabling, etc. It is a completely different system than what I had with the Double Impacts.
The exceptions: the very front end of my computer audio chain [server / network] (early in the process of also changing) and the isolation components in my system (which I may re-evaluate).
As I read posts made by other members who have the SEs, I see a similar pattern (mostly).
Our hobby is naturally one of improvement and upgrades, but I see a number of us (myself included) moving rapidly in this area. The SEs are Most Deserving of it.