Talk but not walk?


Hi Guys

This isn't meant to start a fight, but it is important to on lookers. As a qualifier, I have my own audio forum where we report on audio issues as we empirically test them. It helps us short cut on theories and developing methods of listening. We have a wide range of systems and they are all over the world adding their experiences to the mix. Some are engineers, some are artist and others are audiophiles both new and old. One question I am almost always asked while I am visiting other forums, from some of my members and also members of the forum I am visiting is, why do so many HEA hobbyist talk theory without any, or very limited, empirical testing or experience?

I have been around empirical testing labs since I was a kid, and one thing that is certain is, you can always tell if someone is talking without walking. Right now on this forum there are easily 20 threads going on where folks are talking theory and there is absolutely no doubt to any of us who have actually done the testing needed, that the guy talking has never done the actual empirical testing themselves. I've seen this happen with HEA reviewers and designers and a ton of hobbyist. My question is this, why?

You would think that this hobby would be about listening and experience, so why are there so many myths created and why, in this hobby in particular, do people claim they know something without ever experimenting or being part of a team of empirical science folks. It's not that hard to setup a real empirical testing ground, so why don't we see this happen?

I'm not asking for peoples credentials, and I'm not asking to be trolled, I'm simply asking why talk and not walk? In many ways HEA is on pause while the rest of audio innovation is moving forward. I'm also not asking you guys to defend HEA, we've all heard it been there done it. What I'm asking is a very simple question in a hobby that is suppose to be based on "doing", why fake it?

thanks, be polite

Michael Green

www.michaelgreenaudio.net


128x128michaelgreenaudio
I do not believe I said that was ALL there was to MG tuning methods?
That particular snippet of my post just happened to reference that as an example and why some just cannot/will not entertain that portion even for starters.

The thread did have the makings of being interesting for the right reasons, however I stand by statement that he went about it the wrong way and that ended up driving its downfall, sad to say.
Oh, well, I guess the take away from all of this is you can’t please everybody. OK, what’s next? We got the Black Fuse, the Blue Fuse, the Graphene super conductor, and the Tuning. What’s next? Please don’t start a thread on some mysterious hum you can’t get rid of or what’s up with high prices for cables. 
On that Geoff you are absolutely correct!

How does it go....
You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time but you CANNOT please all of the people all of the time.
Or some tosh similar to that.

Dunno, what is the next mysterious evil tweak that needs dissection?
You especially can’t please the folks who don’t actually use tweaks and who don’t really care. 😀 You seem like someone who enjoys these wild goose chases. Why don’t you pick one? 🦆 🦆 🦆
Well if the next big tweak does not jump out at one maybe its time to just go and enjoy some music on one's hifi, Walkman, whatever.