Talk but not walk?


Hi Guys

This isn't meant to start a fight, but it is important to on lookers. As a qualifier, I have my own audio forum where we report on audio issues as we empirically test them. It helps us short cut on theories and developing methods of listening. We have a wide range of systems and they are all over the world adding their experiences to the mix. Some are engineers, some are artist and others are audiophiles both new and old. One question I am almost always asked while I am visiting other forums, from some of my members and also members of the forum I am visiting is, why do so many HEA hobbyist talk theory without any, or very limited, empirical testing or experience?

I have been around empirical testing labs since I was a kid, and one thing that is certain is, you can always tell if someone is talking without walking. Right now on this forum there are easily 20 threads going on where folks are talking theory and there is absolutely no doubt to any of us who have actually done the testing needed, that the guy talking has never done the actual empirical testing themselves. I've seen this happen with HEA reviewers and designers and a ton of hobbyist. My question is this, why?

You would think that this hobby would be about listening and experience, so why are there so many myths created and why, in this hobby in particular, do people claim they know something without ever experimenting or being part of a team of empirical science folks. It's not that hard to setup a real empirical testing ground, so why don't we see this happen?

I'm not asking for peoples credentials, and I'm not asking to be trolled, I'm simply asking why talk and not walk? In many ways HEA is on pause while the rest of audio innovation is moving forward. I'm also not asking you guys to defend HEA, we've all heard it been there done it. What I'm asking is a very simple question in a hobby that is suppose to be based on "doing", why fake it?

thanks, be polite

Michael Green

www.michaelgreenaudio.net


128x128michaelgreenaudio
@michaelgreenaudio "Guys buying $10,000.00-$250,000.00 speakers and (get a load of this, this will kill ya) and putting them in a living room, against the wall with (I’m not joking, I swear to God I'm serious lol) with a huge equipment rack in between them."

Sadly, that's always been how a lot of folks set up their loudspeakers.  That's also why every one of us have heard modest systems easily and surely outperform much more expensive ones.  Unless we invest in good setup, we lose out on so much the investment we make in our equipment
That happens as the BOSS of the house says:

..."You can have all the audio, and all the video you want.....as long as I never have to hear it, and never have to see it."

Yes ma’am.....

What an absolute shock that MG made yet another "angry people" post instead of one with content relevant to what people have written, or even content relevant to his own thread subject. 

But, I doubt any of us can get enough about what a cheery, nice guy he is...and how much music he listens to!  

Michael, how can I learn more about your products?

Oh, there it is, right under your name again.

Thanks for thinking of us!


Mikey what happened to Eighth Nerve Audio located in Nashville? Did you sell them rights to build products that look just like yours? Or were they yours? 6moons did a review and had pictures..Not angry just wondering. 
trelja,

Sadly, that's always been how a lot of folks set up their loudspeakers.
This is certainly true, but the biggest part of that is that it is inconvenient to walk around the speakers that are in the middle of the room, or something like that. Perfect position may not always be the livable-with one. There comes a trade-off. I am sure that modest systems may outperform more expensive ones when everything is aligned well, but I would expect that, if both are placed where they are allowed to be placed, expensive ones will still be better. Of course, I have no examples to provide, but simply have that feeling based on my own very limited experience. Strangely so, in my own room, speakers really did not have that much difference when moved away from the walls and the trade-off was clearly on the side of "closer to the wall".

I wonder how many people who read these threads (not only this one) have an actual dedicated listening room. It must be a good number. Putting your music reproduction system in the living room may not allow for perfect positioning and tweaking/tuning, but adds the benefit of having it close to ears. That may be good enough of a proposition to some. If I am correct that more expensive system under the same circumstances will still outperform more expensive one, in some areas it may end up being cheaper investing more in equipment than in another room. A person just has to accept that the system is not playing to the full potential which, I am aware of that, may drive many people who visit Audiogon up the wall.

Along the lines of speaker positioning, some speaker manufacturers, not the shabbiest ones at that, proudly display speakers on their websites right next to the wall or really close to it. There are even those placed right in front of the glass wall. Check Dynaudio and Dali websites for such examples.