Take an old photograph made with old technology. Do you think you can accurately reproduce it with better tech? Of course. If you were to take that old photo and took a photo of it with the same old tech it was originally taken with, you'd end up with a degraded facsimile.
Do it enough times and you'd have an awful looking photo compared to the original. All of that old tech was good enough to arrive at it's present state of existence. Now, the order of the day is to faithfully reproduce what you have with something of an order better than the original so as to not further degrade it.
In fact, you can pull off of that recording things you wouldn't/couldn't get with the older tech. They do it all the time when remastering.
All the best,
Nonoise
Do it enough times and you'd have an awful looking photo compared to the original. All of that old tech was good enough to arrive at it's present state of existence. Now, the order of the day is to faithfully reproduce what you have with something of an order better than the original so as to not further degrade it.
In fact, you can pull off of that recording things you wouldn't/couldn't get with the older tech. They do it all the time when remastering.
All the best,
Nonoise