Tekton DI Monitors


Finally got to see the measurements for the Double Impact monitors. I’m a little disappointed.

https://www.stereophile.com/content/tekton-design-impact-monitor-loudspeaker-measurements

This woofer - tweeter - woofer configuration is similar to the style named after the esteemed Joseph D’Appolito. Done well this configuration functions like a single large woofer in terms of dispersion. Less floor and ceiling bounce yield better detail at the listening position. 

Interestingly, the Audiogon craze of criticizing the tweeter array for possible comb filtering is not what I’m sad about. In fact the array appears to be the least of the issues. Look at figure 4. The horizontal plots are superbly clean. Any comb filtering from the tweeter array would be displayed here, and it’s not. Those critics going nuts about the array’s poor performance can apologize for their uninformed criticism right now.

The problem is really the vertical response. It is terrible. Here we do have evidence of comb filtering! See the plot closest to the viewer in figure 5? See the regularly occurring hills and valleys completely absent from figure 4? That my friends is comb filtering. However it’s not coming from the tweeter array, but from the two widely placed woofers. There’s also a great deal of hash above 5kHz on this same plot. This makes me so very very sad.

Part of this is fixable. As Dr. D’Appolito discovered, the designer should have used a higher order crossover slope, which would have taken care of the hash above 5 kHz. However the comb filtering below this is not easily remedied. The issue has to do with how far away the two woofers are from each other. They are so far, and cut in so high that they can’t help but interfere with each other and this woofer to woofer distance is ultimately controlled by the size of the tweeter array.

Should you buy this speaker? I think you should listen to it. See how it sounds to you as you move around your listening space. If you find yourself enamored of the mid-treble resolution and detail, I would encourage you to listen to other Tekton designs that don’t attempt a D’Appolito design, because I'm afraid that the main benefit of this type of design, narrow mid-woofer dispersion, is lost.  A simpler 2-way would avoid these issues and be as good at detail and resolution 
erik_squires
I wonder if tipping them back would help with this issue? I would think standing 15-25 feet back would be better if the speaker was tipped back slightly. I realize this can impact other performance areas, but a very slight tip back may be nice for some owners. 
Hey Erik,

You keep referring to the DI Monitor as a "quasi' D'Appolito design" , however I politely disagree with this statement.  Since it is not a D'Appolito design to begin with, therefore it by logic it can't be a "quasi" version by default.  As I shared above on this thread this is a three way (co-axial single point tweeter/midrange flanked by the two woofers) all D'Appolito designs are MW/T/MW drivers, two-ways, not three- way designs.

In my home the DI Monitors still sound excellent when I'm going about my business, but still want to enjoy music.  Of course, when I sit in the sweet spot it's more magical, but it does not become horrible off axis at all.
Agreed. I had a set in my home with the DIs and did hear the effects when standing up.I still thought they sounded decent when standing a good distance away from them.  The slight tilt back may be a nice little tweak however. 
It's really sad what passes for "professional" writing on the internet.

there does not interchange with their.

then does not interchange with than.

These are simple rules we learned in the sixth grade.

Okay, that's MY pet peeve, off my soap box now.......