Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

Mapman, Recalling an earlier conversation that we had on the subject of imaging of Ohms, omni's, and conventional speakers, FWIW I set up my conventional speakers so that the tweeter axis crosses in front of the listener position on about the same angle that the Ohm use. Interesting isn't it. Perhaps if Rebbi hasn't already tried this, he might find it interesting to do so with his boxes. BTW, this set up also solved some first reflection problems from side walls and ceilings that I had.

Newbee,

You mean toeing in the Arros?

Rebbi, Yes. It only takes a couple of seconds and is instantly reversible, especially with small speakers. :-) But, keep the distance relationships between speakers and listening position more traditional...don't get them too far apart (mine are set up with the speakers about 9ft apart and my ears just over 10feet from the speakers.

Have fun...........

Some of the old, more conventional, Ohm FRS line was visibly a variation of the 45 degree inward tweeter orientation theme.

http://www.ohmspeakers.com/store_item_list.cfm?TYPE=CONVENTIONAL%20SPEAKERS&cart_ID=12191242340438

Winegasman, This is another interesting comparison! Once I heard time coherent speakers, I had a tough time going back to most dynamic speakers. I listened to Meadowlarks and Vandersteens, and I liked how the music spilled into the room, drawing me in, instead of being fired at my ears. But like you said, the sweet spot can be small. The Ohms remind me of time coherent speakers, but with a sweet spot that allows more than one person to listen.